[Issue 4268] New: ambiguous name mangling for local functions

2010-06-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4268 Summary: ambiguous name mangling for local functions Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 4269] New: invalid type accepted if evaluated while errors are gagged

2010-06-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4269 Summary: invalid type accepted if evaluated while errors are gagged Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW

[Issue 4235] !in not working (D1)

2010-06-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4235 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code | --- Comment #5 from Don

[Issue 3662] Wrong compile error within struct constructor and C-style initializer

2010-06-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3662 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Issue 4270] New: Missing line number in 'can only catch class objects' error message

2010-06-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4270 Summary: Missing line number in 'can only catch class objects' error message Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW

[Issue 4270] Missing line number in 'can only catch class objects' error message

2010-06-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4270 --- Comment #1 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-06-04 13:15:49 PDT --- Bug 3712 is a combination of this bug, with a D1-only error. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving

[Issue 4270] Missing line number in 'can only catch class objects' error message

2010-06-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4270 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---

[Issue 1382] memory allocated for arrays in CTFE functions during compilation is not released

2010-06-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1382 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---

[Issue 4271] New: drop/pop methods for std.algorithm.BinaryHeap

2010-06-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4271 Summary: drop/pop methods for std.algorithm.BinaryHeap Product: D Version: future Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

[Issue 4271] drop/pop methods for std.algorithm.BinaryHeap

2010-06-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4271 --- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-06-04 15:40:21 PDT --- In most of my usages of a heap I don't have just to use the top item or just to pop the top item, I have to pop the top item and then use the popped out item. To perform

[Issue 4272] New: x.typeof syntax

2010-06-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4272 Summary: x.typeof syntax Product: D Version: future Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: DMD

[Issue 4271] drop/pop methods for std.algorithm.BinaryHeap

2010-06-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4271 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-06-04 16:00:04 PDT --- Sorry, that was a partially wrong comment, I meant: So I have to use: somefunction(heap.pop(1)[0]); But being this operation so common, I'd like to write simpler code:

[Issue 4273] Error: functions cannot return a tuple

2010-06-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4273 --- Comment #2 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2010-06-04 17:16:41 PDT --- Fixing this would require conflating a Tuple!(T) with T. I think this would be a mistake. -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 4273] Error: functions cannot return a tuple

2010-06-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4273 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 4270] Missing line number in 'can only catch class objects' error message

2010-06-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4270 --- Comment #3 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-06-04 17:36:00 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) An idea: comment out the error() that doesn't accept a line number, then fix all calling points that use it. That's exactly how I found this

[Issue 4273] Error: functions cannot return a tuple

2010-06-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4273 --- Comment #3 from Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org 2010-06-04 18:21:00 PDT --- You're right, it was a mistake in my code. Sorry. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this

[Issue 4274] New: Better array of inner structs error message

2010-06-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4274 Summary: Better array of inner structs error message Product: D Version: future Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: diagnostic Severity: