[Issue 4231] Solitary opUnary Postincrement and Postdecrement user defined operators are broken.

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4231 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #10 from

[Issue 4231] Solitary opUnary Postincrement and Postdecrement user defined operators are broken.

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4231 --- Comment #11 from Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com 2010-06-08 00:24:37 PDT --- Hrm.. I haven't studied the side effect code enough. Do you know why Comma:Exp::checkSideEffect isn't just: return e1-checkSideEffect(flag) ||

[Issue 4231] Solitary opUnary Postincrement and Postdecrement user defined operators are broken.

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4231 --- Comment #12 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-06-08 01:22:02 PDT --- (In reply to comment #11) Hrm.. I haven't studied the side effect code enough. Do you know why Comma:Exp::checkSideEffect isn't just: return

[Issue 4231] Solitary opUnary Postincrement and Postdecrement user defined operators are broken.

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4231 --- Comment #13 from Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com 2010-06-08 02:07:14 PDT --- Something about that code bugs me, but I'm having trouble deciding exactly what it is. Part of it is that there's redundant work. Move the new code inside the

[Issue 3690] Folding Complex!(Complex!T) to Complex!T

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3690 Lars T. Kyllingstad bugzi...@kyllingen.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 4293] Wrong line number with @disable

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4293 --- Comment #2 from Jason House jason.james.ho...@gmail.com 2010-06-08 03:31:12 PDT --- My goal with doing this was to catch uses of the default constructor because in the original use case, it was always a bug. -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 4294] New: Importing std.typecons in two modules while unittesting breaks program

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4294 Summary: Importing std.typecons in two modules while unittesting breaks program Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Issue 4294] Importing std.typecons in two modules while unittesting breaks program

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4294 --- Comment #1 from Simen Kjaeraas simen.kja...@gmail.com 2010-06-08 03:57:39 PDT --- Allow me to rectify a mistake in the original post. dmd a b -unittest compiles with no problems. dmd b a -unittest is what causes the posted bug. --

[Issue 4231] Solitary opUnary Postincrement and Postdecrement user defined operators are broken.

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4231 --- Comment #14 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-06-08 04:13:39 PDT --- (In reply to comment #13) Something about that code bugs me, but I'm having trouble deciding exactly what it is. Part of it is that there's redundant work. Move

[Issue 4294] Importing std.typecons in two modules while unittesting breaks program

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4294 Simen Kjaeraas simen.kja...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 4003] The result changes only with the order of source files.

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4003 Simen Kjaeraas simen.kja...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3923] std.algorithm.find is too much hard to understand

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3923 Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wbax...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 4003] The result changes only with the order of source files.

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4003 Lars T. Kyllingstad bugzi...@kyllingen.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3923] std.algorithm.find is too much hard to understand

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3923 Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3923] std.algorithm.find is too much hard to understand

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3923 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3441] Snow Leopard: Static constructors do not work

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3441 Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3441] Snow Leopard: Static constructors do not work

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3441 --- Comment #1 from Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org 2010-06-08 10:07:23 PDT --- Verified as fixed against DMD 2.046. I'll look at DMD1x as well to be sure. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Issue 4295] New: IID_IUnknown symbol undefined in phobos.lib

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4295 Summary: IID_IUnknown symbol undefined in phobos.lib Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: link-failure, rejects-valid

[Issue 4295] IID_IUnknown symbol undefined in phobos.lib

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4295 Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||spec --- Comment #2 from

[Issue 4295] IID_IUnknown symbol undefined in phobos.lib

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4295 --- Comment #3 from Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de 2010-06-08 11:30:20 PDT --- Just found out that pragma(lib, uuid) is actually present in std.windows.iunknown! But this one is more or less obsolete. std.c.windows.com contains more functionality and

[Issue 4296] New: Reduce parasitic error messages

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4296 Summary: Reduce parasitic error messages Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: diagnostic Severity: enhancement

[Issue 4177] __ctfe can't be used in pure functions

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4177 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Issue 3428] OSX 10.6.1 Access violation when writing to global variables

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3428 --- Comment #4 from Christopher O'Neill digitalm...@chrisoneill.co.uk 2010-06-08 12:10:21 PDT --- The original bug report was filed against DMD1, not DMD2. However, I can confirm that this bug is indeed fixed in DMD v1.061. -- Configure

[Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463 --- Comment #12 from Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org 2010-06-08 12:22:20 PDT --- Yeah, the patch doesn't work any more. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail

[Issue 3806] TypeInfo_Const has member base in object_.d and member next in object.di

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3806 --- Comment #1 from Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org 2010-06-08 13:08:01 PDT --- There appears to be little consistency with this field for TypeInfo. Some have a next member, some have a base member, and some have an m_next member. I'm

[Issue 3779] [123][0][$-1] causes __dollar unresolved in compile-time.

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3779 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||link-failure, rejects-valid

[Issue 4297] New: Nothrow functions cannot use constant dynamic array

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4297 Summary: Nothrow functions cannot use constant dynamic array Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity:

[Issue 4298] New: Constant array translated to unnecessary array literal creation

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4298 Summary: Constant array translated to unnecessary array literal creation Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: x86 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords:

[Issue 4298] Constant array translated to unnecessary array literal creation

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4298 Shin Fujishiro rsi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #1

[Issue 4003] The result changes only with the order of source files.

2010-06-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4003 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED