http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3294
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4631
Summary: const array literal rebuilt on every usage
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: performance, wrong-code
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Comment #20 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-08-12 01:04:26 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #19)
Don, which version of the patch did you apply - the one attached here or the
one I applied to LDC? Selective imports work correctly in LDC, so
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4632
Summary: Copy constructor not invoked on array reallocation
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4630
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4621
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Comment #21 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-08-12 06:11:44 PDT ---
In my understanding, import std.stdio : writefln; only imports the name
writefln, not std and writefln. If the user wants std, he has to write
static import std.stdio;. I would
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4621
nfx...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nfx...@gmail.com
--- Comment #8
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4621
--- Comment #9 from Michel Fortin michel.for...@michelf.com 2010-08-12
09:37:20 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
I think rather than prevent where these items should go, you should just not
call the destructor when the struct/class is being
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4621
--- Comment #10 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2010-08-12
06:43:37 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
C# and Java have safe finalizers.
According to the few pages I googled for C# finalizers, this is not true. You
are not
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4621
--- Comment #11 from Michel Fortin michel.for...@michelf.com 2010-08-12
09:54:51 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
C# and Java have safe finalizers.
Indeed. Java allows resurrection, which means that if you leak a reference to
an object
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4621
--- Comment #12 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-08-12 07:06:10 PDT ---
By the way, separation between finalizers and destructors has been in Tango for
ages.
There's the Object.dipose() method. This method is only called on deterministic
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Comment #22 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-08-12 07:09:34 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #21)
In my understanding, import std.stdio : writefln; only imports the name
writefln, not std and writefln. If the user wants std, he has to write
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4621
--- Comment #13 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-08-12 07:10:27 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
This is an interesting idea, but I see two reasons it'll not work fro D.
First,
D doesn't emit special code notifying the GC when assigning to a
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Comment #23 from Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com 2010-08-12 07:25:12
PDT ---
(In reply to comment #22)
(In reply to comment #21)
In my understanding, import std.stdio : writefln; only imports the name
writefln, not std and writefln.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4619
--- Comment #2 from Rod�ric Vicaire ing...@libertysurf.fr 2010-08-12 07:37:29
PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Please post a complete example. I cannot reproduce it on Win32.
Here it is (DMD2.047 or DMD2.048 on Windows):
module main;
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4633
Summary: typeof({return 1;}()) declaration fails if inside main
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4619
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4621
--- Comment #14 from Michel Fortin michel.for...@michelf.com 2010-08-12
10:46:23 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #13)
This isn't so much of a problem if you assume objects with finalizers are
rare.
They can be collected in the next GC cycle.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4621
--- Comment #15 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-08-12 08:10:19 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Beside, is it worth it? I mean, what is the use of a resurrected object beyond
providing a little more safety? Given the multithreading model, we know
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4614
Justin Whear mrjn...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4624
--- Comment #1 from Michel Fortin michel.for...@michelf.com 2010-08-12
12:29:25 EDT ---
Additionally, I believe std.containers.Array has a race condition when stored
in the GC heap. The Array destructor checks the reference count before
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4621
--- Comment #16 from Michel Fortin michel.for...@michelf.com 2010-08-12
12:30:40 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #15)
Running on a different thread still makes a severe difference to shared or C
data. C APIs usually aren't thread-safe. For some
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Comment #24 from Christian Kamm kamm-removet...@incasoftware.de
2010-08-12 10:33:50 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #20)
(In reply to comment #19)
Don, which version of the patch did you apply - the one attached here or the
one I applied
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Comment #25 from Christian Kamm kamm-removet...@incasoftware.de
2010-08-12 10:45:00 PDT ---
Gah, can you edit comments somehow? That typo is extremely embarrassing.
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4634
Summary: typo in levenshteinDistanceAndPath documentation
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4634
--- Comment #1 from Nick Treleaven ntrel-pub...@yahoo.co.uk 2010-08-12
11:00:07 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=714)
fix
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=314
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #364 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4635
Summary: to!string fails for Variant and structs with
uninitalized (=void) static arrays
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1323
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4404
David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
31 matches
Mail list logo
