[Issue 1715] Template specialization checks for equality rather than convertibility

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1715 Mike Linford mike.linf...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 1715] Template specialization checks for equality rather than convertibility

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1715 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #4 from

[Issue 1001] print stack trace (in debug mode) when program die

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1001 --- Comment #31 from Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de 2010-09-16 05:07:27 PDT --- Note that ddmd has custom working stack trace code for windoze. Maybe this could help in some way. http://dsource.org/projects/ddmd -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 4290] 'Fragile' opCmp/toHash signature errors

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4290 Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 1715] Template specialization checks for equality rather than convertibility

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1715 --- Comment #5 from Mike Linford mike.linf...@gmail.com 2010-09-16 09:34:29 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #2) http://www.dsource.org/projects/dmd/changeset/675 DMD 1.063 gives the

[Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463 --- Comment #80 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-09-16 11:26:43 PDT --- By the way, if the patch is going to be accepted, it would probably be good to get rid of the NO_SCAN flags. Instead, NO_SCAN should be detected by examining the PointerMap. A

[Issue 4875] Allow struct initialization with constructor

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4875 --- Comment #4 from Sobirari Muhomori dfj1es...@sneakemail.com 2010-09-16 15:36:08 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) You may write this: class File { HANDLE Handle = HANDLE(5); } Hmm... giving it another thought, forcing explicit

[Issue 4290] 'Fragile' opCmp/toHash signature errors

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4290 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-09-16 17:21:12 PDT --- Answer to comment2: I understand what you say only partially. In my opinion silently ignoring the opCmp() and toHash() like in my first example is not acceptable for the D

[Issue 4877] New: Hole in Const System: popFront()

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4877 Summary: Hole in Const System: popFront() Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: accepts-invalid Severity: normal

[Issue 4579] std.typecons.Tuple syntax unpacking sugar

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4579 --- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-09-16 19:24:57 PDT --- 'auto' too may be supported: void main() { (auto fc, auto fa, auto fm) = getTimes(filename); } Or even: void main() { auto (fc, fa, fm) = getTimes(filename); }