http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4295
--- Comment #5 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2010-09-27 23:05:55
PDT ---
The pragma was added by Andrei in the meantime, so you might consider it fixed.
Please consider deprecating/removing std.windows.iunknown, because it only
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4952
Summary: One missing binary search for switch()
Product: D
Version: D1 D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: performance
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4953
Summary: opBinaryRight for in doesn't work right
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3971
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|enhancement |major
--- Comment #14 from
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4349
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4952
--- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-09-28 18:32:31 PDT ---
Some simple benchmark code, for comparison:
Timings, NLOOPS = 100_000, best of 6, seconds:
DMD: 7.70
GCC: 2.42
gcc 4.5.1, -Wall -O3 -s
dmd 2.049, -O -release -inline
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2095
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---