date:20101029

[Issue 3020] No description is given why function may not be nothrow

2010-10-29 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3020 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3020] No description is given why function may not be nothrow

2010-10-29 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3020 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 620] Can't use property syntax with a template function

2010-10-29 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=620 Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrmoc...@gmx.de --- Comment

[Issue 2946] Make 'abstract' mandatory if the class is intended to be abstract

2010-10-29 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2946 --- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-10-29 05:01:02 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) The compiler is behaving correctly, therefore this is an enhancement request. We need a different term to tell apart true enhancement requests

[Issue 5128] New: Forbid abstract attribute for nonabstract methods

2010-10-29 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5128 Summary: Forbid abstract attribute for nonabstract methods Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: accepts-invalid Severity:

[Issue 5129] New: More strict 'abstract' management

2010-10-29 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5129 Summary: More strict 'abstract' management Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal

[Issue 3020] No description is given why function may not be nothrow

2010-10-29 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3020 --- Comment #7 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-10-29 05:30:34 PDT --- (In reply to comment #5) Out of memory errors should be allowed inside nothrow. Good. I think so too. That will make nothrow much more useful. In the existing compiler,

[Issue 5018] segfault / stack overflow when calling overriden Stream.writeBlock

2010-10-29 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5018 Adrian Matoga e...@atari8.info changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 5130] New: writeln cannot take delegate

2010-10-29 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5130 Summary: writeln cannot take delegate Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component:

[Issue 2608] int[] literal too polysemous

2010-10-29 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2608 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 4539] Refuse assignment to string literal

2010-10-29 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4539 --- Comment #6 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-10-29 09:55:19 PDT --- A related bug found by denis spir: auto p = hello; String literals aren't lvalues, so you can't take their address. Just as you can't tale the address of a decimal

[Issue 3020] No description is given why function may not be nothrow

2010-10-29 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3020 --- Comment #8 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2010-10-29 10:29:39 PDT --- (In reply to comment #7) In the existing compiler, they are disallowed. That's a bug. ( void foo() nothrow { auto x = new int; } won't compile). I

[Issue 5129] More strict 'abstract' management

2010-10-29 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5129 nfx...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nfx...@gmail.com --- Comment #1

[Issue 3020] No description is given why function may not be nothrow

2010-10-29 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3020 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 5131] New: [ICE] opAssign and associative arrays (AA) are broken for types != this

2010-10-29 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5131 Summary: [ICE] opAssign and associative arrays (AA) are broken for types != this Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW

[Issue 5132] New: ~ unary operator silently different from C

2010-10-29 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5132 Summary: ~ unary operator silently different from C Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 4846] A problem with array of std.typecons.Tuple

2010-10-29 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4846 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 3813] Bad writeln of arrays

2010-10-29 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3813 --- Comment #8 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-10-29 17:28:53 PDT --- import std.stdio, std.range; void main() { writeln(iota(5)); } With DMD 2.050 that program prints: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4] But that's not an array, it's a lazy sequence, and

[Issue 3846] Unexpected BufferedFile output

2010-10-29 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3846 --- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-10-29 17:33:10 PDT --- The second problem is now fixed, this code compiles, see bug 2718 : import std.stream: BufferedFile, FileMode; import std.conv: to; void main() { auto fout = new