[Issue 6052] [CTFE] Structs elements in an array are treated like reference type

2011-05-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6052 kenn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Issue 6079] New: [CTFE] Array index out of bound detection is off-by-one

2011-05-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6079 Summary: [CTFE] Array index out of bound detection is off-by-one Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Keywords: accepts

[Issue 6080] Statically constructed Structs - Constructor/Initialization ambiguity

2011-05-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6080 --- Comment #1 from Daniel 2011-05-31 02:24:56 PDT --- And, it should be consistent between statically defined and locally defined structs? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receivin

[Issue 6080] New: Statically constructed Structs - Constructor/Initialization ambiguity

2011-05-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6080 Summary: Statically constructed Structs - Constructor/Initialization ambiguity Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW

[Issue 6079] [CTFE] Array index out of bound detection is off-by-one

2011-05-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6079 --- Comment #1 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-05-31 02:39:16 PDT --- The bug was introduced in commit 4120b86*, I believe this is because of if (indexToModify > destarraylen) // ^ should be >=. *: https:/

[Issue 6080] Statically constructed Structs - Constructor/Initialization ambiguity

2011-05-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6080 Andrej Mitrovic changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- Comme

[Issue 6080] Statically constructed Structs - Constructor/Initialization ambiguity

2011-05-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6080 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc --- Com

[Issue 6081] Function Literal Templates Don't Work when Nested in Templates

2011-05-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6081 --- Comment #1 from wfunct...@hotmail.com 2011-05-31 07:38:43 PDT --- Well, sorry: if you say "function" instead of "delegate", the error _does_ change... it becomes: Error: delegate std.algorithm.__dgliteral1 cannot access frame of functio

[Issue 6081] Function Literal Templates Don't Work when Nested in Templates

2011-05-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6081 --- Comment #2 from wfunct...@hotmail.com 2011-05-31 07:39:36 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Well, sorry: if you say "function" instead of "delegate", the error _does_ > change... it becomes: > > Error: delegate std.algorithm.__dglitera

[Issue 6081] New: Function Literal Templates Don't Work when Nested in Templates

2011-05-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6081 Summary: Function Literal Templates Don't Work when Nested in Templates Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: n

[Issue 4129] ICE(glue.c, !vthis->csym): anonymous delegate literal in tuple

2011-05-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4129 kenn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kenn...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 fr

[Issue 6082] New: Constructors of templated types should be callable vi IFTI

2011-05-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6082 Summary: Constructors of templated types should be callable vi IFTI Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

[Issue 796] Asserting a null object reference throws AssertError Failure internal\invariant.d(14) or Access Violation

2011-05-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=796 Mike Shulman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||viritrilbi...@gmail.com --- Comment #9 f

[Issue 6083] New: There can be only one alias this.

2011-05-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6083 Summary: There can be only one alias this. Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD

[Issue 6080] Statically constructed Structs - Constructor/Initialization ambiguity

2011-05-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6080 --- Comment #4 from Daniel 2011-05-31 16:32:01 PDT --- Thanks for simplifying it mate. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 6083] [TDPL] There can be only one alias this.

2011-05-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6083 Jonathan M Davis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com Summa

[Issue 3688] Can't have declaration with assignment to const/immutable inside if condition

2011-05-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3688 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 6072] [CTFE] Regression(git master): Cannot declare variable inside an 'if' condition

2011-05-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6072 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|