[Issue 4375] Require explicit braces when 'else' is ambiguous

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4375 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6365] AutoTupleDeclaration

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6365 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #33

[Issue 6560] Exponentiation operator ^^ doesn't work for complex numbers

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6560 --- Comment #4 from bdsat...@gmail.com 2011-08-27 03:00:15 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) The deprecation of the built-in complex numbers will cause the deprecation of their nice literals too. This means in your program you are not really

[Issue 6560] Exponentiation operator ^^ doesn't work for complex numbers

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6560 --- Comment #5 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-08-27 04:03:38 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) D1 agrees with Prof. Kahan but D2 diverges so that it can introduce inadvertent errors (http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/cppcomplex.html).

[Issue 6385] isInputRange!(ubyte[2u]) is a failure when used in global scope

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6385 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 6557] Inplace enum literals

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6557 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-08-27 05:06:36 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) I think the enum scope inference from their member name is nearly impossible, because D has template function. The feature requires a function

[Issue 6414] Possible problem with pure and const attribute

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6414 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 6560] Exponentiation operator ^^ doesn't work for complex numbers

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6560 --- Comment #6 from bdsat...@gmail.com 2011-08-27 07:14:06 PDT --- (In reply to comment #5) I found a workaround for ^^, looks like this works: import std.stdio; import std.complex; void main() { auto x = Complex!real(1,2); auto y =

[Issue 2927] Ignore Interior GC attribute

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2927 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 5623] Slow GC with large heaps

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5623 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Issue 6560] Exponentiation operator ^^ doesn't work for complex numbers

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6560 --- Comment #7 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-08-27 07:29:09 PDT --- (In reply to comment #6) I couldn't test the above because sqrt( ) and log( ) are not implemented for complex numbers in 2.051. I do not know the situation in 2.055head.

[Issue 6489] Should be able to copy double[] to float[]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6489 --- Comment #4 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2011-08-27 07:34:39 PDT --- The compelling rationale is consistency. I can assign the elements of a float[] to a double[] one-by-one, so why not with array-wise operations? -- Configure

[Issue 2105] Manual Memory Management for Associative Arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2105 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Issue 2327] opDot() should work as expected with operator overloading.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2327 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 2818] Pointer parameters in core.memory should be const(void)*.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2818 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 4782] core.atomic.atomicLoad broken for floating point

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4782 --- Comment #2 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2011-08-27 08:47:59 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/61 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving

[Issue 6550] Allow (auto var = expression) in while() loops

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6550 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 5432] if/for/while inconsistency: while( auto a = ... ) does not compile

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5432 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com

[Issue 5432] Allow variable declaration inside while condition

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5432 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com

[Issue 5432] Allow variable declaration inside while condition

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5432 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2

[Issue 3009] format.d(2072) uses deprecated function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3009 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Issue 6563] New: wrong code when using at least 8 XMM regs

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6563 Summary: wrong code when using at least 8 XMM regs Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Issue 6543] RDMD -I character limitation

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6543 GreatEmerald past...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6452] RDMD shouldn't put the compiler in the rsp file

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6452 GreatEmerald past...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||past...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 6563] wrong code when using at least 8 XMM regs

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6563 --- Comment #1 from d...@dawgfoto.de 2011-08-27 12:46:10 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/343 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Issue 6548] [e2ir.c] Problem with ^^ vector op

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6548 --- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com 2011-08-27 13:02:04 PDT --- Can you see if you can break things in any way after this commit? https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/344 Regards Iain -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 2941] Wrong code for inline asm because CPU type is set too late

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2941 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6489] Should be able to copy double[] to float[]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6489 --- Comment #5 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-08-27 16:18:55 PDT --- Please show one or more use case. Do you want it to be like a reinterpret cast? Currently this works: void main() { ushort[4] a = [1, 2, 3, 4]; uint[2] b =