[Issue 4374] Required do-while ending semicolon

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4374 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 5926] D2 shows empty command line on Windows 98 SE

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5926 Denis verylonglogin@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P5

[Issue 6296] Assertion failure: '0' on line 1114 in file 'glue.c'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6296 Denis verylonglogin@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Issue 3849] [missing error] Array literal length doesn't match

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3849 --- Comment #11 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-09-10 02:35:35 PDT --- See also: http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.Darticle_id=144237 From that post: The solution is to add some symbol that explicitly

[Issue 3805] std.format writeUpToFormatSpec function has subtle loop index bug, will drop character after a %%

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3805 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Issue 4775] No substitution on writef(%%%s, hi)

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4775 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||y0uf00...@gmail.com

[Issue 6640] New: More formatting consistency between string and range of char

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6640 Summary: More formatting consistency between string and range of char Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Issue 2367] Overloading error with string literals

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2367 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zeljko@gmail.com ---

[Issue 5371] ambiguous stringnize of class with alias this

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5371 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Issue 6639] Difference beetwen foo and fooc

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6639 --- Comment #2 from zeljkog zeljko@gmail.com 2011-09-10 17:12:58 CEST --- Sorry for duplication. My point is maybe we don’t need unannotated string literal out of lexer. Maybe c is better default, but we need simple rule. Confess I’m not

[Issue 4927] writefln silently ignores arguments not present in the format string

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4927 --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2011-09-10 08:35:19 PDT --- That is a design of formattedWrite. Andrei talked: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/231#issuecomment-1995490 Phobos used to make a fuss about

[Issue 6639] Difference beetwen foo and fooc

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6639 --- Comment #3 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2011-09-11 01:36:14 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) My point is maybe we don’t need unannotated string literal out of lexer. Maybe c is better default, but we need simple rule. Confess I’m

[Issue 6641] RefAppender!(T[]) should be OutputRange.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6641 --- Comment #2 from SHOO zan77...@nifty.com 2011-09-10 08:41:34 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) I think RefAppender should just be deprecated/scheduled for deprecation. It was a short term backwards compatibility hack from a long time ago.

[Issue 6643] New: Very slow compilation for large switch() using -O and -inline

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6643 Summary: Very slow compilation for large switch() using -O and -inline Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 4927] writefln silently ignores arguments not present in the format string

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4927 --- Comment #2 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com 2011-09-10 09:28:47 PDT --- One possibility would be to silently ignore arguments is positional parameters are used, and not ignore them otherwise. -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 6643] Very slow compilation for large switch() using -O and -inline

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6643 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---

[Issue 4927] writefln silently ignores arguments not present in the format string

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4927 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-09-10 10:50:28 PDT --- If a programmer wants to format just the first argument, then this is the code to write: writef(%d, 1); writefln(2); Introducing/keeping a muddy semantics to avoid writing

[Issue 5237] writefln doesn't respect Complex.toString

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5237 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Issue 5346] instantiation of std.conv.toImpl and std.format.formatValue fails for unions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5346 --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2011-09-10 11:50:43 PDT --- Partial fixed in 2.055. formatValue is now support union formatting. void main() { U u; //writeln(text(u)); // toImpl error instantiation toImpl

[Issue 6642] SysTime should not be hasUnsharedAliasing

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6642 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3849] [missing error] Array literal length doesn't match

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3849 --- Comment #12 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2011-09-10 18:31:01 PDT --- (In reply to comment #11) See also: http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.Darticle_id=144237 From that post: The solution

[Issue 3069] Issue 3069 - Array literals do not implicitly cast to void[]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3069 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED