[Issue 6823] New: Shared Delegates Should Implicitly Cast to Nonshared

2011-10-18 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6823 Summary: Shared Delegates Should Implicitly Cast to Nonshared Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2

[Issue 6824] New: core.time.TickDuration.to template problem

2011-10-18 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6824 Summary: core.time.TickDuration.to template problem Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Issue 6473] Stack overflow with struct destructor as default parameter

2011-10-18 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6473 --- Comment #2 from Trass3r 2011-10-18 05:01:06 PDT --- Very interesting. Any idea how to solve it? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

Possible bug with dynamic rectangular array initialization

2011-10-18 Thread Robert
Hello, When I try to initialize a dynamic rectangular array, the length of the inner arrays does not seem to be preserved outside the scope of initialization. I'm not proficient enough in D to say that my code is completely correct, but if I am correct this might be a serious bug. See attached test

[Issue 6825] New: Address of templated method incorrectly taken

2011-10-18 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6825 Summary: Address of templated method incorrectly taken Product: D Version: D1 & D2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: reg

[Issue 6825] Regression(2.055+): Address of templated method incorrectly taken

2011-10-18 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6825 Trass3r changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Address of templated method |Regression(2.055+): Address

Re: Possible bug with dynamic rectangular array initialization

2011-10-18 Thread bearophile
Robert: > When I try to initialize a dynamic rectangular array, the length of the inner > arrays does not seem to be preserved outside the scope of initialization. I'm > not proficient enough in D to say that my code is completely correct, but if > I am correct this might be a serious bug. See att

[Issue 6824] core.time.TickDuration.to template problem

2011-10-18 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6824 Jonathan M Davis changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 6502] failing with -release -inline -noboundscheck

2011-10-18 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6502 Jonathan M Davis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc --- Comment

[Issue 6502] failing with -release -inline -noboundscheck

2011-10-18 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6502 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 6488] DMD compiler bug

2011-10-18 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6488 --- Comment #3 from Walter Bright 2011-10-18 10:18:19 PDT --- *** Issue 6502 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail

[Issue 6488] DMD compiler bug

2011-10-18 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6488 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 6827] New: `assert(0)` is ignored in a function template

2011-10-18 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6827 Summary: `assert(0)` is ignored in a function template Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 6826] stdio.File.readf docs incorrect

2011-10-18 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6826 --- Comment #1 from Jerry Quinn 2011-10-18 11:47:35 PDT --- Also, I assume the return value is the one generated by readFormatted(), but it should be explicitly stated. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=

[Issue 6781] Regression(2.055): Segfault with error in local alias template

2011-10-18 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6781 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 6828] New: Module Scope Operator not working for classes

2011-10-18 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6828 Summary: Module Scope Operator not working for classes Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Co

[Issue 6783] Implicit cast to immutable from pure function

2011-10-18 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6783 --- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-10-18 15:02:34 PDT --- This enhancement request has some problems. See also: http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D.learn&article_id=30139 -- Configure issuemai

[Issue 6829] New: Unsigned rotate standard function in Phobos

2011-10-18 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6829 Summary: Unsigned rotate standard function in Phobos Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Co

valgrind flags memory leak in _d_monitor_create

2011-10-18 Thread Sean Silva
I'm on Ubuntu x64, with the vanilla DMD .deb installed. I have attached the output of valgrind. The program that triggers valgrind to report the leak it is practically any that I run, including just a bare "void main() { }". It looks like _d_monitor_create is calloc'ing 72 bytes of memory that get

Re: valgrind flags memory leak in _d_monitor_create

2011-10-18 Thread Jonathan M Davis
On Wednesday, October 19, 2011 05:51:51 Sean Silva wrote: > --nextPart77593048.e8O9o76Zdv > > I'm on Ubuntu x64, with the vanilla DMD .deb installed. > > I have attached the output of valgrind. The program that triggers > valgrind to report the leak it is practically any that I run, including > j