[Issue 6833] New: Double literals outputted without comma in headers

2011-10-20 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6833 Summary: Double literals outputted without comma in headers Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 6177] Regression(2.053): Insert in associative array: Internal error: backend/cgcs.c 162

2011-10-20 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6177 Richard Webb we...@beardmouse.org.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 5354] formatValue: range templates introduce 3 bugs related to class struct cases

2011-10-20 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5354 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #18

[Issue 6834] New: std.stdio conflicts with core.stdc.stdio

2011-10-20 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6834 Summary: std.stdio conflicts with core.stdc.stdio Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 6018] Multiple includes of std.parallelism causes DMD to segfault.

2011-10-20 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6018 Jonathan Crapuchettes jcrapuchet...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6835] New: Code pattern: uniq on an array

2011-10-20 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6835 Summary: Code pattern: uniq on an array Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component:

[Issue 6365] AutoTupleDeclaration

2011-10-20 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6365 --- Comment #36 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2011-10-20 19:08:36 PDT --- Scala has similar syntax. http://www.scala-lang.org/docu/files/ScalaReference.pdf p.170 | Changes in Version 2.6.1 (30-Nov-2007) | Mutable variables introduced by

[Issue 6365] AutoTupleDeclaration

2011-10-20 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6365 --- Comment #37 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2011-10-20 19:20:06 PDT --- (In reply to comment #34) We should really strive to get a consistent syntax for this. auto (x, y) is a totally specialized syntax. See comment #19. It is a

[Issue 6813] Yet another cannot get frame pointer error

2011-10-20 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6813 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 6813] Yet another cannot get frame pointer error

2011-10-20 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6813 --- Comment #3 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2011-10-20 20:21:45 PDT --- It shrinks down to this. Compile with -inline: struct Foo(T) { Foo opSlice(size_t a, size_t b) { return Foo(_indices[a..b]);

[Issue 6836] New: map + UFCS = fail

2011-10-20 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6836 Summary: map + UFCS = fail Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD