[Issue 7093] New: aliased type sometimes isn't resolved

2011-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7093 Summary: aliased type sometimes isn't resolved Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component:

[Issue 7094] New: More initializers than struct fields for static member creation

2011-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7094 Summary: More initializers than struct fields for static member creation Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords:

[Issue 7093] aliased type sometimes isn't resolved

2011-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7093 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch, rejects-valid

[Issue 6872] Breaking type parsing of shared(inout(int)[])

2011-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6872 --- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2011-12-11 03:38:49 PST --- Following cases are also rejected. static assert((shared(inout(const(int)[]))).stringof == shared(inout(const(int)[]))); static

[Issue 7095] New: GC doesn't return or reuse unused memory [D2.056]

2011-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7095 Summary: GC doesn't return or reuse unused memory [D2.056] Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 7096] New: statement.html - content does not belong to main column

2011-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7096 Summary: statement.html - content does not belong to main column Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 7097] New: opDollar doesn't work with slicing

2011-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7097 Summary: opDollar doesn't work with slicing Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Issue 7095] GC doesn't return or reuse unused memory [D2.056]

2011-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7095 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 7096] statement.html - content does not belong to main column

2011-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7096 --- Comment #1 from danas.mikelins...@gmail.com 2011-12-11 09:48:47 PST --- possibly relevant that I used Opera 11.60 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Issue 7095] GC doesn't return or reuse unused memory [D2.056]

2011-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7095 --- Comment #2 from Heywood Floyd soul...@gmail.com 2011-12-11 10:01:25 PST --- I understand. Thanks for the reply! (With risk of polluting the bug tracker here, but perhaps to clarify the workaround: Could GC.malloc/free be used as well?

[Issue 7095] GC doesn't return or reuse unused memory [D2.056]

2011-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7095 --- Comment #3 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2011-12-11 10:12:27 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) I understand. Thanks for the reply! (With risk of polluting the bug tracker here, but perhaps to clarify the workaround: Could

[Issue 4620] C++ constructor and template mangling, C++ ABI patch

2011-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4620 Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 7095] GC doesn't return or reuse unused memory [D2.056]

2011-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7095 deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||deadal...@gmail.com

[Issue 7095] GC doesn't return or reuse unused memory [D2.056]

2011-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7095 --- Comment #5 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2011-12-11 10:38:41 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) Isn't GC has a flag that says if something may contains pointer or not ? Why this flag is set when allocation an array of long ? It's

[Issue 6872] Breaking type parsing of shared(inout(int)[])

2011-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6872 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6763] Using TypeTuple with (const/in/ref etc.) changes it forever

2011-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6763 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 7093] aliased type sometimes isn't resolved

2011-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7093 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6056] Type lookup problem in string mixins

2011-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6056 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6953] std.concurrency needs more documentation

2011-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6953 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 7098] New: Annoying Forward Reference Error When Compiling Multiple Files

2011-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7098 Summary: Annoying Forward Reference Error When Compiling Multiple Files Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords:

[Issue 6855] shared(immutable(T)) should be immutable(T)

2011-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6855 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6922] [TDPL] superimposing of const and immutable does not work correctly

2011-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6922 --- Comment #8 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2011-12-11 19:34:35 PST --- *** Issue 6855 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 6987] The Memory Management documentation incorrectly claims arrays are passed by reference.

2011-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6987 --- Comment #2 from Bernard Helyer blood.of.l...@gmail.com 2011-12-11 20:27:59 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org/pull/43 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Issue 7008] Associative array ABI is under-specified

2011-12-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7008 --- Comment #3 from Jerry Quinn jlqu...@optonline.net 2011-12-11 21:32:49 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) Being an opaque pointer means that the implementation of associative arrays is entirely up to the runtime, not the compiler. The