[Issue 7106] DMD Segmentation faults!

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7106 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 7120] Scope Delegates + Delegate Literals

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7120 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #1

[Issue 7174] Cannot use property function call as static if condition

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7174 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch, rejects-valid

[Issue 7196] Unfair function address overload resolution

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7196 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch, rejects-valid

[Issue 4976] Can't use auto on const member functions.

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4976 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Issue 7196] Unfair function address overload resolution

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7196 Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s...@iname.com ---

[Issue 7196] Unfair function address overload resolution

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7196 --- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-01-02 03:19:13 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) This is strange - issue 52 is marked as fixed, so why does it still EVER pick the wrong instance? This problem is only when the caller of

[Issue 7073] Parsing of class-returning varargs function inside module ctor fails

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7073 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch, rejects-valid

[Issue 4349] Deprecate automatic case fallthrough

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4349 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 7198] New: Delegate literals with nameless arguments fail to infer a type

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7198 Summary: Delegate literals with nameless arguments fail to infer a type Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords:

[Issue 7198] Delegate literals with nameless arguments fail to infer a type

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7198 --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-01-02 05:35:59 PST --- I guess the trouble is that the delegate argument Widget is interpreted as a parameter name, not the type. Using int instead of Widget compiles. Yes, you're right.

[Issue 7198] Delegate literals with nameless arguments fail to infer a type

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7198 Alex R�nne Petersen xtzgzo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 7198] Delegate literals with nameless arguments fail to infer a type

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7198 --- Comment #3 from Alex R�nne Petersen xtzgzo...@gmail.com 2012-01-02 05:46:26 PST --- (I don't actually know why we have unnamed parameters at all; most modern languages simply don't allow this. In addition, unused parameters in

[Issue 7198] Delegate literals with nameless arguments fail to infer a type

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7198 Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@me.com --- Comment

[Issue 7199] New: std.string.indexof cannot be compiled with -inline

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7199 Summary: std.string.indexof cannot be compiled with -inline Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid

[Issue 7198] Delegate literals with nameless arguments fail to infer a type

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7198 --- Comment #6 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2012-01-02 07:44:36 PST --- Ok, I understand. There are already a number of situation where the decision Type/Variable is deferred to the semantic phase. Would it be possible to do the

[Issue 7198] Delegate literals with nameless arguments fail to infer a type

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7198 --- Comment #7 from Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com 2012-01-02 09:09:00 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #3) (I don't actually know why we have unnamed parameters at all; most modern languages

[Issue 7200] New: Array append causes Access Violation with symbolic debug info

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7200 Summary: Array append causes Access Violation with symbolic debug info Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords:

[Issue 7201] New: Lambda template assignment to variable

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7201 Summary: Lambda template assignment to variable Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

[Issue 7202] New: Hole in type system still present for delegates

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7202 Summary: Hole in type system still present for delegates Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: accepts-invalid Severity:

[Issue 7196] Unfair function address overload resolution

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7196 --- Comment #4 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-01-02 11:47:18 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #2) This is strange - issue 52 is marked as fixed, so why does it still EVER pick the wrong instance? This problem is

[Issue 5813] [patch] std.array.Appender has severe performance and memory leak problems.

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5813 --- Comment #15 from Rob Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu 2012-01-02 12:02:40 PST --- Vladimir, the code in https://github.com/CyberShadow/ae/blob/master/utils/appender.d seems to be under the MPL, which isn't Phobos compatible. What license is the

[Issue 5813] [patch] std.array.Appender has severe performance and memory leak problems.

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5813 --- Comment #16 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2012-01-02 12:10:18 PST --- (In reply to comment #15) Vladimir, the code in https://github.com/CyberShadow/ae/blob/master/utils/appender.d seems to be under the MPL, which

[Issue 7203] New: Method pointer types differ depending on context

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7203 Summary: Method pointer types differ depending on context Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 7204] New: [CTFE] Assertion failure when attempting to access function pointer of delegate

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7204 Summary: [CTFE] Assertion failure when attempting to access function pointer of delegate Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Issue 5813] [patch] std.array.Appender has severe performance and memory leak problems.

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5813 --- Comment #17 from Rob Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu 2012-01-02 13:16:19 PST --- That said, I did write a faster chained appender for your benchmarks; however I did this by initializing the appender with a page of memory, which definitely

[Issue 5813] [patch] std.array.Appender has severe performance and memory leak problems.

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5813 --- Comment #18 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2012-01-02 13:32:01 PST --- (In reply to comment #17) For part 1 (fastest possible 'chained' appender): Simply construct specifying a large number of elements. i.e. auto app

[Issue 7205] New: Function attribute inference fails in case of mutual dependencies

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7205 Summary: Function attribute inference fails in case of mutual dependencies Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 7206] New: Constructor from mixin does not conflict with other constructors

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7206 Summary: Constructor from mixin does not conflict with other constructors Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 7206] Constructor from mixin does not conflict with other constructors

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7206 --- Comment #1 from Robert Clipsham rob...@octarineparrot.com 2012-01-02 22:13:34 GMT --- I forgot to mention, when ErrorsAsExpected is not defined, this prints b, the constructor from the mixin is disregarded. -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 7206] Constructor from mixin does not conflict with other constructors

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7206 timon.g...@gmx.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timon.g...@gmx.ch --- Comment #2

[Issue 7206] Constructor from mixin does not conflict with other constructors

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7206 Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Issue 7201] Lambda template assignment to variable

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7201 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #1

[Issue 7198] Delegate literals with nameless arguments fail to infer a type

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7198 --- Comment #8 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-01-02 16:59:46 PST --- (In reply to comment #6) Ok, I understand. There are already a number of situation where the decision Type/Variable is deferred to the semantic phase. Would it

[Issue 7202] Hole in type system still present for delegates

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7202 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #1

[Issue 7196] Unfair function address overload resolution

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7196 --- Comment #5 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-01-02 18:18:56 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) If the compiler rewrites (foo)(arguments...) to foo(arguments...), is it now able to inline delegates that are called directly like for

[Issue 7203] Method pointer types differ depending on context

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7203 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 7207] New: Explicit cast should resolve lambda type

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7207 Summary: Explicit cast should resolve lambda type Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 7208] New: Unique arrays should be covariant

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7208 Summary: Unique arrays should be covariant Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component:

[Issue 7208] Unique arrays should be covariant

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7208 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 7208] Unique arrays should be covariant

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7208 --- Comment #2 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-01-02 22:14:18 PST --- No. There is no issue if the array is provable unique. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail

[Issue 7207] Explicit cast should resolve lambda type

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7207 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch, rejects-valid