[Issue 7398] New: spell checker should suppress error messages

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7398 Summary: spell checker should suppress error messages Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 7375] Regression(2.057): Invalid downcast permitted with derived/aliased template classes

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7375 --- Comment #3 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-01-30 01:20:02 PST --- The failure definitely happened between 2.056 and 2.057. Anyone care to run the git binary diff thing? -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 7375] Regression(2.057): Invalid downcast permitted with derived/aliased template classes

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7375 --- Comment #4 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-01-30 02:02:19 PST --- Auch, I found it. In druntime/src/rt/cast_.d, the addition of a name compare saying the classes are the same in _d_isbaseof and _d_isbaseof2. Not sure what

[Issue 7375] Regression(2.057): Invalid downcast permitted with derived/aliased template classes

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7375 --- Comment #5 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-01-30 02:04:29 PST --- The culprit: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/commit/5d21d47b5adda97759d15ec0139c0d5fac646971 -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 7396] Indicate default alignment with 0.

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7396 --- Comment #8 from Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com 2012-01-30 03:09:44 PST --- (In reply to comment #6) I would suggest the problem is with the way gdc is doing alignment. align: means the default alignment that matches the C

[Issue 7373] (Regression git) Renamed imports conflict with other implicitly imported symbols

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7373 --- Comment #3 from Leandro Lucarella leandro.lucare...@sociomantic.com 2012-01-30 03:11:07 PST --- Thanks for the fix. Maybe it would be a good idea to add the test case to the test suite to make sure this will never break again. --

[Issue 7396] Indicate default alignment with 0.

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7396 --- Comment #9 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-01-30 03:19:50 PST --- This I think is different from how DMC++ treats the align attribute, which is where the conflict of interest arises. Which means that dmd should change to

[Issue 7396] Indicate default alignment with 0.

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7396 --- Comment #10 from Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com 2012-01-30 03:55:12 PST --- (In reply to comment #9) This I think is different from how DMC++ treats the align attribute, which is where the conflict of interest arises. Which means

[Issue 2172] statically disallow bool + bool

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2172 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---

[Issue 2563] Derived class is implicitly castable to Base class when inherited privately

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2563 --- Comment #7 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2012-01-30 04:33:58 PST --- (In reply to comment #6) D1 only now, as of issue 5299 private inheritance is deprecated in D2. But it hasn't actually _worked_ in D1 for some time, and the spec

[Issue 2172] statically disallow bool + bool

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2172 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Issue 2563] Derived class is implicitly castable to Base class when inherited privately

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2563 --- Comment #8 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2012-01-31 02:29:01 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) But it hasn't actually _worked_ in D1 for some time, and the spec has never actually given its meaning. As such, it would be to the point to

[Issue 7396] Indicate default alignment with 0.

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7396 --- Comment #11 from Daniel Green ven...@gmail.com 2012-01-30 08:06:37 PST --- (In reply to comment #9) The addition of an align(0) is not the right solution. Currently, `align:` becomes`align(8)`. Ambiguous. default alignment or 8 byte?

[Issue 7375] Regression(2.057): Invalid downcast permitted with derived/aliased template classes

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7375 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 7399] New: Broken import statement in trySemantic() causes silent compiler error

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7399 Summary: Broken import statement in trySemantic() causes silent compiler error Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 7400] New: failing local imports not fully gagged in is expression

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7400 Summary: failing local imports not fully gagged in is expression Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Issue 7399] Broken import statement in trySemantic() causes silent compiler error

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7399 klickverbot c...@klickverbot.at changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timon.g...@gmx.ch

[Issue 7400] failing local imports not fully gagged in is expression

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7400 klickverbot c...@klickverbot.at changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 926] Revival of implicit conversion from Derived[] to Base[] not noted in changelog

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=926 Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Issue 7375] Regression(2.057): Invalid downcast permitted with derived/aliased template classes

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7375 d...@dawgfoto.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@dawgfoto.de --- Comment #7

[Issue 7375] Regression(2.057): Invalid downcast permitted with derived/aliased template classes

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7375 --- Comment #8 from d...@dawgfoto.de 2012-01-30 10:01:25 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/142 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail

[Issue 6720] ICE(cod1.c) casting return of void function to bool

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6720 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@puremagic.com|clugd...@yahoo.com.au ---

[Issue 7375] Regression(2.057): Invalid downcast permitted with derived/aliased template classes

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7375 --- Comment #9 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-01-30 11:12:29 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 7375] Regression(2.057): Invalid downcast permitted with derived/aliased template classes

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7375 --- Comment #10 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-01-30 11:12:36 PST --- Commit pushed to dmd-1.x at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 7375] Regression(2.057): Invalid downcast permitted with derived/aliased template classes

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7375 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 7375] Regression(2.057): Invalid downcast permitted with derived/aliased template classes

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7375 --- Comment #11 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-01-30 11:17:53 PST --- I fixed this in the compiler, not the runtime. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving

[Issue 7396] Indicate default alignment with 0.

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7396 --- Comment #12 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-01-30 11:21:01 PST --- (In reply to comment #11) Currently, `align:` becomes`align(8)`. Ambiguous. default alignment or 8 byte? This is the misunderstanding. align:

[Issue 926] Revival of implicit conversion from Derived[] to Base[] not noted in changelog

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=926 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 7396] Indicate default alignment with 0.

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7396 --- Comment #13 from Daniel Green ven...@gmail.com 2012-01-30 11:40:30 PST --- (In reply to comment #12) (In reply to comment #11) Currently, `align:` becomes`align(8)`. Ambiguous. default alignment or 8 byte? This is the

[Issue 7396] Indicate default alignment with 0.

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7396 --- Comment #14 from Daniel Green ven...@gmail.com 2012-01-30 12:01:15 PST --- The statement: `align:` becomes `align(8)` in based entirely on how the parser handles the align attribute. // excerpt from parse.c line 503. case TOKalign: {

[Issue 7396] Indicate default alignment with 0.

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7396 --- Comment #15 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-01-30 12:20:04 PST --- Right, it's a compiler issue. Not a language issue, and no new language features or syntax are required. -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 2483] DMD allows assignment to a scope variable

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2483 --- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-01-30 12:22:23 PST --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 7396] Indicate default alignment with 0.

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7396 --- Comment #16 from Daniel Green ven...@gmail.com 2012-01-30 12:23:45 PST --- (In reply to comment #15) Right, it's a compiler issue. Not a language issue, and no new language features or syntax are required. Yes, I agree. My proposal was

[Issue 2483] DMD allows assignment to a scope variable

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2483 --- Comment #5 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-01-30 12:24:53 PST --- Commit pushed to dmd-1.x at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 2483] DMD allows assignment to a scope variable

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2483 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 7365] [Regression after 2.057] AAs broken for Object keys and values with opEquals

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7365 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-01-30 12:35:44 PST --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 7365] [Regression after 2.057] AAs broken for Object keys and values with opEquals

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7365 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 7365] [Regression after 2.057] AAs broken for Object keys and values with opEquals

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7365 --- Comment #4 from klickverbot c...@klickverbot.at 2012-01-30 12:48:27 PST --- Seems to WORKSFORME now as well, not sure when it was fixed or what the problem was beforeā€¦ -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 7365] [Regression after 2.057] AAs broken for Object keys and values with opEquals

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7365 klickverbot c...@klickverbot.at changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Issue 7401] New: Pure contracts Unnecessarily strict

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7401 Summary: Pure contracts Unnecessarily strict Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: DMD

[Issue 7401] Pure contracts Unnecessarily strict

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7401 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---

[Issue 7401] Pure contracts Unnecessarily strict

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7401 --- Comment #2 from Era Scarecrow rtcv...@yahoo.com 2012-01-30 14:55:06 PST --- (In reply to comment #1) See also issue 7224 (that asks kind of the opposite) In his remark, it seems rather silly. Of course it won't raise an exception when

[Issue 7401] Pure contracts Unnecessarily strict

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7401 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-01-30 15:07:54 PST --- I think the right solution for this problem is to wait for to!string(int) to become pure. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Issue 7402] New: Appending enum string causes type change?

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7402 Summary: Appending enum string causes type change? Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 7397] [Regression] std.path.buildPath can't be used with string[]

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7397 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch, rejects-valid

[Issue 7365] [Regression after 2.057] AAs broken for Object keys and values with opEquals

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7365 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Issue 7365] [Regression after 2.057] AAs broken for Object keys and values with opEquals

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7365 --- Comment #6 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-01-30 16:31:00 PST --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime

[Issue 7404] New: std.range.SortedRange.release() property

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7404 Summary: std.range.SortedRange.release() property Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

[Issue 7405] New: std.algorithm.schwartzSort.release

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7405 Summary: std.algorithm.schwartzSort.release Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component:

[Issue 7404] std.range.SortedRange.release() property

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7404 --- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-01-30 17:40:04 PST --- See also issue 7405 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 4476] __traits for more kinds of names

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4476 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-01-30 17:44:25 PST --- Another useful __traits is to find all classes in the given/current module. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 7258] std.array.array of const items

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7258 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com

[Issue 7396] Indicate default alignment with 0.

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7396 d...@dawgfoto.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@dawgfoto.de --- Comment #17

[Issue 7402] Appending enum string causes type change?

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7402 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid, wrong-code

[Issue 5080] breaking const-correctness with class/interface

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5080 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3731] Can implicitly cast an immutable reference to a derived class

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3731 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k.hara...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 3759] Implementing two interfaces with same final function is accepted

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3759 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 4647] [tdpl] Cannot explicitly call final interface method, ambiguous calls allowed

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@esperanto.org.ar

[Issue 1973] static on interfaces should be an error

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1973 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 2553] Excess attribute propagation for interfaces

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2553 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ben...@tionex.de ---

[Issue 3969] Built-in compile time errors against usage of wrong operator strings

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3969 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com

[Issue 4313] undefined identifier error with scope guard statement

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4313 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com

[Issue 4517] final switch over with base type allows missing values

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4517 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Issue 4545] Alias to members possible without this instance

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4545 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Issue 4062] can call method without this pointer inside is()

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4062 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tomeks...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 4554] Cyclic constructor calls cause stack overflow

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4554 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Issue 5178] StructLiteral should not be lvalue

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5178 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 5889] Struct literal/construction should be rvalue (it binds to ref parameters)

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5889 --- Comment #13 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2012-01-31 14:36:09 EST --- *** Issue 5178 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 6458] Multibyte char literals shouldn't implicitly convert to char

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6458 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com

[Issue 6458] Multibyte char literals shouldn't implicitly convert to char

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6458 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #11

[Issue 7406] New: tuple foreach doesn't work with mixed tuples

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7406 Summary: tuple foreach doesn't work with mixed tuples Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 6497] [safeD] Can take address of local variable through ?:

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6497 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Issue 7407] New: Can't implicitly convert char[][] to const(char)[][]

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7407 Summary: Can't implicitly convert char[][] to const(char)[][] Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: regression Priority: P2

[Issue 6564] enum with no initializer compiles

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6564 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6564] enum with no initializer compiles

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6564 --- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-01-30 22:19:30 PST --- (In reply to comment #1) --- x.di --- enum Length; That's not generated by the compiler (at least not 2.057, I don't know about 2.058 HEAD). But how

[Issue 7407] Can't implicitly convert char[][] to const(char)[][]

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7407 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6564] enum with no initializer compiles

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6564 --- Comment #3 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2012-01-31 17:25:22 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) That's not generated by the compiler (at least not 2.057, I don't know about 2.058 HEAD). It doesn't get generated by the compiler, but you

[Issue 6578] Ignored const with struct with constructor

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6578 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|diagnostic |patch CC|

[Issue 7408] New: traits compiles fails for built-in properties of template instances

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7408 Summary: traits compiles fails for built-in properties of template instances Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 6564] enum with no initializer compiles

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6564 --- Comment #4 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-01-30 22:38:43 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) An enum declaration creates its own type, so in the same kind of places you'd want to pass around an opaque struct pointer.

[Issue 7403] Possible to instantiate forward referenced classes

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7403 Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@me.com --- Comment

[Issue 6720] ICE(cod1.c) casting return of void function to bool

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6720 --- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-01-30 23:22:15 PST --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 5796] ICE with pragma(msg, ...) after missing '; ' in a template

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5796 --- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-01-30 23:22:18 PST --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 6706] 'inout' is accepted in foreach, but apparently ignored

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6706 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6760] Disallow disabled overrides

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6760 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 1449] deprecated methods are counted as interface implementation

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1449 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Issue 6760] Disallow disabled overrides

2012-01-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6760 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||larsi...@igesund.net ---