[Issue 8477] [2.060 beta] Strange error calling member func from overridden Exception::toString()

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8477 Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@me.com --- Comment

[Issue 8477] [2.060 beta] Strange error calling member func from overridden Exception::toString()

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8477 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-07-31 01:23:51 PDT --- It's official. http://forum.dlang.org/post/jtlj1k$1fdj$1...@digitalmars.com -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Issue 8469] isSorted fails with predicate a.length b.length ? true : a b

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8469 --- Comment #9 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-07-31 02:01:53 PDT --- (In reply to comment #8) It's very simple, if isSorted finds two adjacent elements a, b that satisfy pred(b, a) it can also check whether pred(a, b) and assert if that's

[Issue 8476] float comparison operand not truncated from real

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8476 --- Comment #6 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-07-31 02:12:51 PDT --- (In reply to comment #5) D made the decision early on that: more precision == better and that any program that relied on results being less accurate was a faulty

[Issue 8481] New: assert can't concatenate strings

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8481 Summary: assert can't concatenate strings Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Phobos

[Issue 8482] New: RefCounted fails on opAssign

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8482 Summary: RefCounted fails on opAssign Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: Phobos

[Issue 8482] RefCounted fails on opAssign

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8482 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@puremagic.com|monarchdo...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 8483] Definition of isOutputList warped due to put implementation

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8483 --- Comment #1 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2012-07-31 04:22:15 PDT --- ** I'm really very sorry that this is such a long post, but I'd like to make request for a serious change to Phobos, so I

[Issue 8483] New: Definition of isOutputList warped due to put implementation

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8483 Summary: Definition of isOutputList warped due to put implementation Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Issue 8474] bitfields doesn't work with bitfield over 31 bits

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8474 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 8484] New: [CTFE] Assertion failure: 'thisval thisval-op == TOKclassreference' on line 4896 in file 'interpret.c'.

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8484 Summary: [CTFE] Assertion failure: 'thisval thisval-op == TOKclassreference' on line 4896 in file 'interpret.c'. Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: x86 OS/Version:

[Issue 8485] New: referencing a deprecated symbol should never compile

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8485 Summary: referencing a deprecated symbol should never compile Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: accepts-invalid Severity:

[Issue 8474] bitfields doesn't work with 32 bit fields

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8474 --- Comment #2 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2012-07-31 09:49:40 PDT --- More details: The problem only appears if the 32 (64) bit field is aligned with 0. THIS will not create a bug: import std.bitmanip; struct A {

[Issue 8486] New: Possibly wrong interaction of Variant and const arrays

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8486 Summary: Possibly wrong interaction of Variant and const arrays Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 8486] Possibly wrong interaction of Variant and const arrays

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8486 klickverbot c...@klickverbot.at changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@klickverbot.at

[Issue 8486] Possibly wrong interaction of Variant and const arrays

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8486 --- Comment #2 from klickverbot c...@klickverbot.at 2012-07-31 13:09:26 PDT --- … the point being that this is, if anything, analogous to the constness of the Variant instance itself, not the contained type. -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 8481] assert can't concatenate strings

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8481 Ellery Newcomer ellery-newco...@utulsa.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 7998] static assert message string printing problem

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7998 Ellery Newcomer ellery-newco...@utulsa.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 4937] std.bitmanip: Allow repeated (identical) bitfield declarations

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4937 Era Scarecrow rtcv...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rtcv...@yahoo.com

[Issue 8487] New: Semantic analysis of templates is insanely slow

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8487 Summary: Semantic analysis of templates is insanely slow Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2

[Issue 8487] Semantic analysis of templates is insanely slow

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8487 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-07-31 20:00:40 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=1130) The results of profiling dmd with googleperftools when compiling the previously attached file Here's the full results from

[Issue 8487] Semantic analysis of templates is insanely slow

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8487 timon.g...@gmx.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timon.g...@gmx.ch --- Comment #2

[Issue 8487] Semantic analysis of templates is insanely slow

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8487 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-07-31 20:45:16 PDT --- Well, the performance can probably be improved, but I'd advise rewriting that snippet to use CTFE instead. I'm trying to figure out how to do that, and I'll

[Issue 8488] New: dmd does not support named HTML entities that contain multiple code points

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8488 Summary: dmd does not support named HTML entities that contain multiple code points Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Issue 8479] dmd and the spec do not match with regards to the list of named character entities that they support

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8479 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull ---

[Issue 8487] Semantic analysis of templates is insanely slow

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8487 --- Comment #4 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-07-31 21:39:19 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=1131) Shorter and simpler module with named entities which takes 0.2+ seconds to compile -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 8487] Semantic analysis of templates is insanely slow

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8487 --- Comment #5 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-07-31 21:42:23 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Well, the performance can probably be improved, but I'd advise rewriting that snippet to use CTFE instead. I'm trying to figure out how to do

[Issue 8487] Semantic analysis of templates is insanely slow

2012-07-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8487 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-07-31 22:13:26 PDT --- Thanks for your solution, though I did figure one out just a little bit ago. Regardless, I think that the original solution should compile in a reasonably