[Issue 16692] New debug experience: possible to execute pure functions during expression evaluation?

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16692 --- Comment #5 from Rainer Schuetze --- The concord plugin in the latest build on https://ci.appveyor.com/project/rainers/visuald allows calling simple free functions, i.e. no arguments. They might have to be given fully

[Issue 18902] -lib crashes on static libraries in the command line

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18902 --- Comment #1 from Eugene Wissner --- https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/8286 --

[Issue 18642] VisualD - Demangle link errors?

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18642 --- Comment #11 from Rainer Schuetze --- > That can probably be turned back off. Done. What slightly annoys me is that the wrapper is now also used with C++ builds that have no D source files in them. I haven't seen any issues

[Issue 18902] New: -lib crashes on static libraries in the command line

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18902 Issue ID: 18902 Summary: -lib crashes on static libraries in the command line Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Issue 18901] New: [Visual D] fatal error C1905: Front-End and Back-End are not compatible (have to use the same processor)

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18901 Issue ID: 18901 Summary: [Visual D] fatal error C1905: Front-End and Back-End are not compatible (have to use the same processor) Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64

[Issue 18846] VisualD - show vtable in debugger

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18846 --- Comment #12 from Rainer Schuetze --- Next build also works with /INCREMENTAL. --

[Issue 18864] Building 64-bit dmd on Windows results in a debug build. The release build doesn't work.

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18864 Atila Neves changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|enhancement |regression --- Comment

[Issue 18899] destroy is inefficient for small structs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18899 --- Comment #5 from Steven Schveighoffer --- (In reply to Manu from comment #4) > Yes, that's what I'm saying :) ... you're not happy with memcpy, do want > element-copy? It's more that I want to copy the one int that is in the

[Issue 12615] Warn against, and then deprecate old alias syntax

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12615 anonymous4 changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||spec

[Issue 12615] Warn against, and then deprecate old alias syntax

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12615 --- Comment #20 from Mike Franklin --- The only reason `alias whetever this` does not use the assignment syntax is that the `alias this = existingname` conflicts with the ability to alias base (i.e. super class) constructors:

[Issue 12615] Warn against, and then deprecate old alias syntax

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12615 Mike Franklin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Issue 17596] dmd d 2.073.2 and 2.074.1 interim generated dmd segfaults on FreeBSD 12-CURRENT

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17596 anonymous4 changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Issue 18885] statfs struct was changed in FreeBSD 12

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18885 anonymous4 changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Issue 12615] Warn against, and then deprecate old alias syntax

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12615 --- Comment #21 from Mike Franklin --- (In reply to Mike Franklin from comment #20) > Find a solution to that and we can finally use the assignment syntax for > alias > this. A proposal to resolve the issue was presented at

[Issue 18620] `error cannot be interpreted at compile time` is missing context where error occurs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18620 Jonathan Wilbur changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 18903] New: std.signals uses _dtor

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18903 Issue ID: 18903 Summary: std.signals uses _dtor Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P1

[Issue 18236] Invalid line reported on error casting enum

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18236 RazvanN changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 18899] destroy is inefficient for small structs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18899 --- Comment #7 from Steven Schveighoffer --- I'm not sure that it is. But we aren't calling memcpy anyway, we are calling _d_arraycopy, not inlined. See the generated AST from Mike's example. --

[Issue 18899] destroy is inefficient for small structs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18899 --- Comment #8 from Steven Schveighoffer --- (In reply to Steven Schveighoffer from comment #7) > See the generated AST ...generated *assembly* --

[Issue 18904] core.internal.string has issues with radix

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18904 Steven Schveighoffer changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull ---

[Issue 18899] destroy is inefficient for small structs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18899 --- Comment #6 from Manu --- memcpy should be an intrinsic, which is implemented using magic... --

[Issue 18904] New: core.internal.string has issues with radix

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18904 Issue ID: 18904 Summary: core.internal.string has issues with radix Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor

[Issue 18899] destroy is inefficient for small structs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18899 --- Comment #9 from Manu --- True. Anyway, I'm just playing devils advocate. I agree, it should do an element copy for small structs. --

[Issue 11331] Inefficient initialization of struct with members = void

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11331 johanenge...@weka.io changed: What|Removed |Added CC||johanenge...@weka.io --- Comment #9

[Issue 18236] Invalid line reported on error casting enum

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18236 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/dmd https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/69a82a612253a47f134cac1e0dab65831fd3f715 Fix Issue 18236 - Invalid line reported on error casting enum

[Issue 18236] Invalid line reported on error casting enum

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18236 github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 18517] Import order is not invariant

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18517 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Marler --- Added 2 tests to dmd for this bug here: https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/8165 but the PR was rejected. Razvan doesn't think tests should be pushed to dmd by themselves (without their

[Issue 18905] [Reg 2.079] C++ classes can no longer be used with -betterC

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18905 Mike Franklin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||slavo5...@yahoo.com

[Issue 18905] [Reg 2.079] C++ classes can no longer be used with -betterC

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18905 --- Comment #1 from Walter Bright --- When compiled with -betterC --

[Issue 18905] [Reg 2.079] C++ classes can no longer be used with -betterC

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18905 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||betterC, C++ --

[Issue 18905] New: [Reg 2.079] C++ classes can no longer be used with -betterC

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18905 Issue ID: 18905 Summary: [Reg 2.079] C++ classes can no longer be used with -betterC Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW

[Issue 18786] AV program detects malware in windows download of DMD

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18786 David M changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vintaged...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 18864] Building 64-bit dmd on Windows results in a debug build. The release build doesn't work.

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18864 Rainer Schuetze changed: What|Removed |Added CC||r.sagita...@gmx.de

[Issue 18642] VisualD - Demangle link errors?

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18642 Manu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Issue 18846] VisualD - show vtable in debugger

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18846 --- Comment #13 from Manu --- Wow! Works on all my tests! Thanks again! I wonder if this feature should be turned on by default now :P --

[Issue 18642] VisualD - Demangle link errors?

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18642 --- Comment #12 from Manu --- I also had that thought... but I tried to push it aside and pretend I never thought of it :P --

[Issue 18846] VisualD - show vtable in debugger

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18846 --- Comment #14 from Manu --- I'm noticing C++ symbols in the vtable don't demangle (ie, DMD). Is there a way to call the C++ demangler that VS uses (to make sure the demangle is identical)? --

[Issue 18833] [REG 2.073] DMD in some cases forgets to generate wrapping TypeInfo for modifiers on classes

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18833 Mike Franklin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||slavo5...@yahoo.com

[Issue 16692] New debug experience: possible to execute pure functions during expression evaluation?

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16692 --- Comment #6 from Manu --- It can call them... even if they mutate global state? --

[Issue 18786] AV program detects malware in windows download of DMD

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18786 --- Comment #4 from David M --- What information does checking the signature give? It shows it's signed, not that it's virus-free. A signature shows that a binary comes from a certain source, not that it carries no payloads.

[Issue 18786] AV program detects malware in windows download of DMD

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18786 --- Comment #3 from greenify --- It's a false positive. You can check the signature of the binary. Please report it to your Antivirus vendors. They traditionally have troubles with the DigitalMars runtime. --

[Issue 16692] New debug experience: possible to execute pure functions during expression evaluation?

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16692 --- Comment #7 from Rainer Schuetze --- Yes, you can also do this in C++. It's necessary to click the "Try Again" icon, though, to not reevaluate it in the watch window with every step. I think this can be done, too. For

[Issue 18786] AV program detects malware in windows download of DMD

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18786 Mike Franklin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||slavo5...@yahoo.com

[Issue 18786] AV program detects malware in windows download of DMD

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18786 --- Comment #5 from greenify --- > I do not believe responsibility for reporting a false positive Well, you are the one using the snake oil software (and possibly even paying for it). Don't forget that D is an open source

[Issue 16692] New debug experience: possible to execute pure functions during expression evaluation?

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16692 --- Comment #8 from Manu --- This is going to be so amazing if it works! --

[Issue 18786] AV program detects malware in windows download of DMD

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18786 --- Comment #6 from greenify --- > What information does checking the signature give? It shows it's signed, not > that it's virus-free. A signature shows that a binary comes from a certain > source, not that it carries no