[Issue 19189] New: Accessing private template member allowed

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19189 Issue ID: 19189 Summary: Accessing private template member allowed Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical

[Issue 19148] Alignment of section does not reflect the maximum alignment of its contents

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19148 --- Comment #4 from Joakim --- Which ldc and DMD versions? Does the just-released LDC 1.11 have this problem? --

[Issue 19190] Circular reference error resolved by getting allMembers

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19190 --- Comment #1 from Yuxuan Shui --- Sorry, wrong version of the code is attached. Here is the offending code: struct lr1 { lr1* a; } template proxy(T) { private alias G = gen!T; static if (is(typeof(G.str))) enum str = G.str; }

[Issue 11431] std.file.slurp with Windows newlines

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11431 Basile B. changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|rejects-valid | CC|

[Issue 11431] std.file.slurp fails with Windows newlines

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11431 Basile B. changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|std.file.slurp with Windows |std.file.slurp fails with

[Issue 11431] std.file.slurp fails with Windows newlines

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11431 Basile B. changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #1 from Basile B. --- pull :

[Issue 19189] Accessing private member of template allowed

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19189 Yuxuan Shui changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Accessing private template |Accessing private member of

[Issue 19190] Circular reference error resolved by getting allMembers

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19190 --- Comment #2 from Yuxuan Shui --- The behavior of the compiler seems to be sensitive to pragma: ... // This is the second `gen` template gen(T: S*, S) { private alias rc = proxy!S; pragma(msg, is(typeof(rc.str))); // false

[Issue 11052] pathSplitter cannot be converted to string[], and to!() template fails

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11052 Basile B. changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull CC|

[Issue 19189] Accessing private member of template allowed

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19189 Basile B. changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 19190] New: Circular reference error resolved by getting allMembers

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19190 Issue ID: 19190 Summary: Circular reference error resolved by getting allMembers Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW

[Issue 11052] allow pathSplitter and to!() template fails

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11052 Basile B. changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Issue 13300] pure function 'std.array.Appender!(T[]).Appender.ensureAddable' cannot call impure function 'test.T.__fieldPostBlit'

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13300 Basile B. changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b2.t...@gmx.com --- Comment #5 from Basile B.

[Issue 18992] Appender doesn't work with structs that have impure postblit

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18992 Basile B. changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Issue 19148] Alignment of section does not reflect the maximum alignment of its contents

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19148 --- Comment #5 from Yuxuan Shui --- (In reply to Joakim from comment #4) > Which ldc and DMD versions? Does the just-released LDC 1.11 have this > problem? Most recent ldc release fix the build problem. But this is a dmd bug nonetheless. This bug

[Issue 19191] New: Memory allocation failure with -profile=gc and dynamic array of opaque handles

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19191 Issue ID: 19191 Summary: Memory allocation failure with -profile=gc and dynamic array of opaque handles Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Windows

[Issue 11052] pathSplitter cannot be converted to string[], and to!() template fails

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11052 Basile B. changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #2 from Basile B. ---

[Issue 19148] Alignment of section does not reflect the maximum alignment of its contents

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19148 --- Comment #8 from Joakim --- OK, if you're so sure it's a problem in dmd's backend, a pull request is welcome. --

[Issue 19148] Alignment of section does not reflect the maximum alignment of its contents

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19148 --- Comment #7 from Yuxuan Shui --- (In reply to Joakim from comment #6) > There was an issue with a ldc header mismatch that kinke found when merging > the 2.081 frontend into ldc: are you sure that's not what you're seeing > instead? > >

[Issue 13416] dead-lock in FreeBSD suspend handler

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13416 --- Comment #12 from Joakim --- Sorry, only seeing your question now. I was simply checking the D tests on FreeBSD back then but I haven't used that OS in years, so can't look into it further now. --

[Issue 19148] Alignment of section does not reflect the maximum alignment of its contents

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19148 --- Comment #6 from Joakim --- There was an issue with a ldc header mismatch that kinke found when merging the 2.081 frontend into ldc: are you sure that's not what you're seeing instead?