Re: [Issue 2725] Pattern matching in static if not working with variadic arguments

2009-03-13 Thread Derek Parnell
en workout how to say it out loud, as in translate it into English. -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia skype: derek.j.parnell

Re: [Issue 2934] "".dup does not return empty string

2009-05-04 Thread Derek Parnell
cating an empty array should return an empty array. Duplicating a null array should return a null array. Is that not intuitive? -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia skype: derek.j.parnell

Re: [Issue 2934] "".dup does not return empty string

2009-05-04 Thread Derek Parnell
0 bytes. Then don't allocate zero bytes. > In any case, this bug is not valid, because the compiler acts as specified > by the spec. I'm having trouble locating the specification for this. > I never compare arrays to null if I can remember, I always check the > length instead, which is consistent for both null and empty arrays. I do the same as you. -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia skype: derek.j.parnell

Re: [Issue 2865] RandomCover not random.

2009-07-06 Thread Derek Parnell
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 17:17:27 + (UTC), d-bugm...@puremagic.com wrote: > I'm not sure how this change escaped from the changelog ... May I suggest ... "manual process"? -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia skype: derek.j.parnell