[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2436
Summary: Unexpected OPTLINK termination
Product: D
Version: 2.020
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: link-failure
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1977
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
BCS wrote:
Hello ponce,
Source code will be released soon under the WTFPL
LOL, now /that's/ a license I can work with!
Why isn't there a version of that with non-offensive wording
There's a hundred nearly-identical software licenses out there, but
that's the only one I've seen that
Clay Smith wrote:
Don wrote:
BCS wrote:
Hello ponce,
Source code will be released soon under the WTFPL
LOL, now /that's/ a license I can work with!
Why isn't there a version of that with non-offensive wording
There's a hundred nearly-identical software licenses out
Joel C. Salomon wrote:
Don wrote:
Why isn't there a version of that with non-offensive wording
There's a hundred nearly-identical software licenses out there, but
that's the only one I've seen that actually tries to be public domain.
DO AS YE WILL PUBLIC LICENSE
BCS wrote:
Hello d-bugm...@puremagic.com,
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2920
Summary: recursive templates blow compiler stack
ReportedBy: bugzi...@digitalmars.com
I was about to mark this as Invalid with a comment that Walter has said
that this is not going to be fixed (the
d-bugm...@puremagic.com wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3423
Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Rory McGuire wrote:
d-bugm...@puremagic.com wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3549
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
Torben Hagerup wrote:
Run under D version 2.037, the program below runs through without raising any
assert exceptions. This shows an erratic behavior with respect to ieeeFlags
that is hardly intended. Other ieeeFlags also work (or, rather, do not work) in
unexpected ways.
d-bugm...@puremagic.com wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4623
--- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com 2010-10-01 11:18:20 PDT ---
I haven't ran dstress using the DMD compiler. I think I stumbled upon the case
somewhere from an archived message on the ML that
d-bugm...@puremagic.com wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5006
Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Hi,
when I compile the current state of my project, I get the following
assertion failure: '!vthis-csym' on line 698 in file 'glue.c'
I tried to reproduce this in a smaller scale, but it only appears in
this very special case. The project currently contains 72 source
Guillaume Chatelet wrote:
Alright my first post is almost unreadable so restarting with the http
version...
Hope it's going to be better.
Why are you using version 2.008??? It was one of the first 'proof of
concept' alpha test versions. It wasn't intended for serious use. Any
version prior
d-bugm...@puremagic.com wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3276
--- Comment #3 from Shin Fujishiro rsi...@gmail.com 2010-11-02 22:11:39 PDT
---
The patch passed dmd, druntime and phobos tests. It couldn't pass the broken
test (runnable/interpret.d) though.
What do you
d-bugm...@puremagic.com wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5093
--- Comment #3 from simon s.d.hamm...@googlemail.com 2010-11-15 11:03:49 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=812)
PATCH against rev 755: implement a module import backtrace for static assert
Implements a module
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday 15 November 2010 12:49:05 Don wrote:
d-bugm...@puremagic.com wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5093
--- Comment #3 from simon s.d.hamm...@googlemail.com 2010-11-15
11:03:49 PST --- Created an attachment (id=812)
PATCH against rev 755
On 14/09/12 14:50, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Friday, 14 September 2012 at 11:28:04 UTC, Don wrote:
--- Comment #0 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2012-09-14 04:28:17
PDT ---
Array literals of char type, have completely different semantics from
string
literals. In module scope:
char[] x
17 matches
Mail list logo
