[Issue 122] DDoc newline behaviour produces suboptimal results

2010-04-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=122 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 122] DDoc newline behaviour produces suboptimal results

2010-03-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=122 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from

[Issue 122] DDoc newline behaviour produces suboptimal results

2010-03-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=122 --- Comment #4 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-03-15 02:08:52 PDT --- Sorry, that patch came out wrong. The first line belongs further up in the function. Around line 965: { p = skipwhitespace(p); pstart = p; +pend = p;

[Issue 122] DDoc newline behaviour produces suboptimal results

2010-03-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=122 --- Comment #5 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-03-15 12:58:16 PDT --- See bug 1628 for a better patch. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 122] DDoc newline behaviour produces suboptimal results

2010-03-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=122 --- Comment #2 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-03-13 13:05:06 PST --- I've worked out what this is. Trailing newlines don't get stripped from the Description section. Yes, action on an ancient bug! Here's a test case: /** foo1 this has