[Issue 12736] @nogc std.algorithm.all
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12736 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P4 --
[Issue 12736] @nogc std.algorithm.all
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12736 berni44 changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@d-ecke.de OS|Windows |All --
[Issue 12736] @nogc std.algorithm.all
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12736
Seb changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||greensunn...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from Seb ---
the problem here is auto-decoding and that it can throw an exception,
The following works as expected:
---
void main() @nogc {
import std.ascii: isDigit;
import std.algorithm: all;
import std.utf : byCodeUnit;
auto b = "12".byCodeUnit.all!isDigit;
}
---
It has long being proposed to disable auto-decoding by introducing an RCString.
I'm not sure whether this should be kept open, because the issue is not on
`all`'s side - all it does is calling `popFront` of string - which happens to
be @nogc (due to throwing UTF Exceptions).
--
[Issue 12736] @nogc std.algorithm.all
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12736 Jon Degenhardt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID |--- --- Comment #3 from Jon Degenhardt --- Valid enhancement request, so reopening. If closed, should have a justification indicating the mechanism expected to eventually achieve the enhancement, or an explanation of why it the request is invalid at the API level. --
[Issue 12736] @nogc std.algorithm.all
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12736
Jon Degenhardt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jrdemail2000-dl...@yahoo.co
||m
--- Comment #2 from Jon Degenhardt ---
Seems a legitimate enhancement request, and in line with the longer term goal
of having Phobos be @nogc when possible. In this particular case, there doesn't
appear to be any reason why the functionality implemented by std.algorithm.all
cannot be @nogc. And, std.algorithm.find could be @nogc as well in this case.
Personally though, I would hesitate to write an enhancement request against
each individual function in Phobos for every attribute, and instead have a
larger placeholder ticket for larger blocks of Phobos, for example, a ticket
for all of std.algorithm. The above is a policy question of course, but if done
this way then this ticket could be closed as a duplicate of the larger ticket,
rather than closing it as invalid.
As aside: std.algorithm.find is @nogc for certain argument types. Example:
@nogc @safe nothrow pure unittest
{
import std.algorithm : find;
import std.range : iota;
assert(find(iota(1,5), 3) == iota(3,5));
}
--
[Issue 12736] @nogc std.algorithm.all
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12736 RazvanN changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||razvan.nitu1...@gmail.com Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from RazvanN --- Why is this an issue? all calls find which is non-nogc. Closing as invalid --
[Issue 12736] @nogc std.algorithm.all
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12736 sinkuup...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sinkuup...@gmail.com See Also||https://issues.dlang.org/sh ||ow_bug.cgi?id=13458 --
