http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1309
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1309
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1309
Rob Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandf...@jhu.edu
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1309
David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dsim...@yahoo.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1309
--- Comment #3 from g...@nwawudu.com 2009-04-07 04:13 ---
The documentation for structs in associative array mentions that opCmp should
be declared as 'int opCmp(ref const MyStruct x) const', this definition should
be applied to
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1309
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-28 13:11 ---
Just a stab in the dark, but you might try making the argument to opCmp 'const
MyStruct' or 'const MyStruct*'. An opCmp shouldn't generally modify its
argument so maybe DMD
