https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16193
Nick Treleaven changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@geany.org
--- Comment #19 from Nick Tr
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16193
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P3
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16193
--- Comment #18 from Dicebot ---
https://trello.com/c/ZQivF6Jj/105-bugzilla-github-integration-issue :(
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16193
anonymous4 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16193
--- Comment #16 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commit pushed to newCTFE at https://github.com/dlang/dmd
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/aac715ff2597d256b5ffe8ecb397316abf32fb2e
Revert "fix Issue 16193 - opApply() doesn't hea
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16193
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16193
Dicebot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16193
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16193
--- Comment #15 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commit pushed to scope at https://github.com/dlang/dmd
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/aac715ff2597d256b5ffe8ecb397316abf32fb2e
Revert "fix Issue 16193 - opApply() doesn't hea
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16193
Dicebot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16193
--- Comment #14 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/dmd
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/aac715ff2597d256b5ffe8ecb397316abf32fb2e
Revert "fix Issue 16193 - opApply() doesn't hea
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16193
--- Comment #13 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commit pushed to stable at https://github.com/dlang/dmd
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/aac715ff2597d256b5ffe8ecb397316abf32fb2e
Revert "fix Issue 16193 - opApply() doesn't hea
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16193
--- Comment #12 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to stable at https://github.com/dlang/dmd
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/f7819c898a05d28297024b7355d4ace94f1e4465
fix Issue 16193 - opApply() doesn't heap allocate cl
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16193
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16193
--- Comment #11 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/dmd
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/f7819c898a05d28297024b7355d4ace94f1e4465
fix Issue 16193 - opApply() doesn't heap allocate cl
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16193
--- Comment #10 from Walter Bright ---
It's possible that was true briefly, but it would have been a regression in
itself because of its negative affect on legacy code.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16193
--- Comment #9 from Walter Bright ---
Related spec change:
https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/pull/1473
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16193
--- Comment #8 from Steven Schveighoffer ---
(In reply to Walter Bright from comment #7)
> Also, this was not a regression.
I distinctly remember at some point in the last 10 years that you HAD to mark
opApply scope or it would allocate a closure. H
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16193
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
Severity|regression
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16193
--- Comment #6 from Walter Bright ---
Not a fix for this bug, but Phobos should be fixed:
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/4787
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16193
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||safe
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16193
ZombineDev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||petar.p.ki...@gmail.com
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16193
--- Comment #5 from Steven Schveighoffer ---
(In reply to Marc Schütz from comment #4)
> Because of separate compilation, the compiler IMO _must not_ rely on the
> implementation details of the called function, it may only use the
> information avai
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16193
--- Comment #4 from Marc Schütz ---
(In reply to Steven Schveighoffer from comment #3)
> (In reply to Marc Schütz from comment #0)
> > I'm deliberately using separate compilation here to
> > make sure that the compiler has no way to infer that the cl
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16193
Steven Schveighoffer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16193
Ketmar Dark changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16193
--- Comment #2 from Ketmar Dark ---
(In reply to Mathias Lang from comment #1)
> Why do you want it to allocate ?
for consistency.
> Either way, I'm just puzzled what's the use case here.
less special cases to remember.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16193
Mathias Lang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mathias.l...@sociomantic.co
28 matches
Mail list logo
