https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17351
Dlang Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17351
Dlang Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #11 from Dlang Bot ---
@Geod24
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17351
ki...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ki...@gmx.net
--- Comment #10 from ki...@gmx.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17351
--- Comment #9 from uplink.co...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to Andrei Alexandrescu from comment #6)
> (In reply to ag0aep6g from comment #5)
> > You have to initialize the int[3], as you did with the int. I suppose the
> > compiler assumes that you'
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17351
Mathias Lang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mathias.l...@sociomantic.co
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17351
--- Comment #8 from ag0ae...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Andrei Alexandrescu from comment #6)
> Now, Lucia (@somzzz) has gotten to the point where it all passes druntime
> and phobos unittests, but breaks in exactly one point in the compiler. It
> can
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17351
ZombineDev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||petar.p.ki...@gmail.com
Hardware|x86_
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17351
--- Comment #7 from Andrei Alexandrescu ---
I meant:
bool __equals(L, R)(L[] lhs, R[] rhs);
bool __equals(L, R, size_t n1)(auto ref L[n1] lhs, R[] rhs);
bool __equals(L, R, size_t n2)(auto ref L[] lhs, auto ref R[n2] rhs);
bool __equals(L, R, size_t
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17351
--- Comment #6 from Andrei Alexandrescu ---
(In reply to ag0aep6g from comment #5)
> You have to initialize the int[3], as you did with the int. I suppose the
> compiler assumes that you're going to do run-time initialization via `static
> this` when
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17351
ag0ae...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ag0ae...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from a
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17351
--- Comment #4 from uplink.co...@googlemail.com ---
As far as I can see there is no special treatment.
CTFE does only work on literals results of ctfe evaluations are always
literals.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17351
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17351
uplink.co...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17351
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||and...@erdani.com
--- Comment #1 from
14 matches
Mail list logo