[Issue 18866] Overload from opDispatch ignored in WithStatement

2023-02-17 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18866 Paul Backus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||snarwin+bugzi...@gmail.com --- Comment #8

[Issue 18866] Overload from opDispatch ignored in WithStatement

2022-12-17 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18866 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P3 --

[Issue 18866] Overload from opDispatch ignored in WithStatement

2019-01-15 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18866 Mike Franklin changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://issues.dlang.org/sh

[Issue 18866] Overload from opDispatch ignored in WithStatement

2018-11-16 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18866 --- Comment #7 from John Hall --- I get that. The point I wanted to highlight was that even if it's not changed at least the spec can be beefed up. --

[Issue 18866] Overload from opDispatch ignored in WithStatement

2018-11-16 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18866 --- Comment #6 from Simen Kjaeraas --- (In reply to John Hall from comment #5) You're right that a new global function will shadow opDispatch, but with the fix the exact opposite problem will appear, so it's not all that simple. --

[Issue 18866] Overload from opDispatch ignored in WithStatement

2018-11-16 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18866 John Hall changed: What|Removed |Added CC||john.michael.h...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from

[Issue 18866] Overload from opDispatch ignored in WithStatement

2018-05-28 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18866 --- Comment #4 from Simen Kjaeraas --- > there would be absolutely no way of calling fun1() from within the > WithStatement body Sure there would. Assuming the same code as in comment 0, you would call the global fun2 using

[Issue 18866] Overload from opDispatch ignored in WithStatement

2018-05-28 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18866 RazvanN changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 18866] Overload from opDispatch ignored in WithStatement

2018-05-16 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18866 --- Comment #2 from Mike Franklin --- Or actually it may be this PR that introduced the issue: https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6439 --

[Issue 18866] Overload from opDispatch ignored in WithStatement

2018-05-16 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18866 Mike Franklin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||slavo5...@yahoo.com