[Issue 19059] Invalid integer literal 08 and 09 allowed

2018-08-24 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19059 --- Comment #9 from Steven Schveighoffer --- *** Issue 16396 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** --

[Issue 19059] Invalid integer literal 08 and 09 allowed

2018-07-12 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19059 --- Comment #8 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/dmd https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/90ab1b325f26d08bd770cd9fd44bed085c775ad9 Fix Issue 19059 - Disallow `08` and `09` in integer literal

[Issue 19059] Invalid integer literal 08 and 09 allowed

2018-07-08 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19059 --- Comment #7 from Hiroki Noda --- I created another issue for invalid octal literals `01` through `07`. https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19070 --

[Issue 19059] Invalid integer literal 08 and 09 allowed

2018-07-05 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19059 RazvanN changed: What|Removed |Added CC||razvan.nitu1...@gmail.com --- Comment #6 from

[Issue 19059] Invalid integer literal 08 and 09 allowed

2018-07-05 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19059 --- Comment #5 from Hiroki Noda --- I am concerned about (2) and (3), is this behavior confusing with the use of std.conv. octal? --- assert(010 == 10); // Error: octal literals 010 are no longer supported, use std.conv.octal!10 instead assert(019

[Issue 19059] Invalid integer literal 08 and 09 allowed

2018-07-05 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19059 Seb changed: What|Removed |Added CC||greeen...@gmail.com --

[Issue 19059] Invalid integer literal 08 and 09 allowed

2018-07-05 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19059 --- Comment #4 from ag0aep6g --- (In reply to Mathias LANG from comment #3) > @ag0aep0g: AFAICS, solution 3 is what's currently implemented. In DMD, yeah. For #3, the spec would need to be updated. --

[Issue 19059] Invalid integer literal 08 and 09 allowed

2018-07-04 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19059 Mathias LANG changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pro.mathias.l...@gmail.com --- Comment #3

[Issue 19059] Invalid integer literal 08 and 09 allowed

2018-07-04 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19059 Mike Franklin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||slavo5...@yahoo.com --- Comment #2 from

[Issue 19059] Invalid integer literal 08 and 09 allowed

2018-07-04 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19059 ag0aep6g changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ag0ae...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from ag0aep6g