[Issue 1923] GC optimization for contiguous pointers to the same page

2009-04-01 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1923 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 1923] GC optimization for contiguous pointers to the same page

2009-03-29 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1923 --- Comment #4 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-03-29 01:54 --- Complete discussion: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/Slow_GC_67673.html --

[Issue 1923] GC optimization for contiguous pointers to the same page

2009-03-29 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1923 --- Comment #5 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-03-29 02:05 --- This patch is already in D2, I'll add it to D1. --

[Issue 1923] GC optimization for contiguous pointers to the same page

2009-03-29 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1923 --- Comment #6 from llu...@gmail.com 2009-03-29 10:15 --- But for some reason D2 (druntime) timings are still huge. Here is a test, dmd es 1.041 with the patch attached here, dmd2 is 2.026. $ cat split.d // Written by bearophile

Re: [Issue 1923] GC optimization for contiguous pointers to the same page

2009-03-29 Thread Sean Kelly
d-bugm...@puremagic.com wrote: But for some reason D2 (druntime) timings are still huge. Have you timed Tango? The GC implementations are roughly the same.

[Issue 1923] GC optimization for contiguous pointers to the same page

2009-03-28 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1923 --- Comment #2 from llu...@gmail.com 2009-03-28 15:17 --- Is there any reason why this patch is no applied? --

[Issue 1923] GC optimization for contiguous pointers to the same page

2009-03-28 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1923 --- Comment #3 from dhase...@gmail.com 2009-03-28 15:50 --- For reference, this patch has been applied to Tango and has not caused any known issues. --