https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2350
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2350
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|D1 & D2 |D2
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2350
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|yebbl...@gmail.com |nob...@puremagic.com
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2350
--- Comment #5 from yebblies ---
wrong-code keyword now applies to D1 only.
--
a naked body are indecent
Error on a naked function with contracts instead of generating wrong code
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/eee87f646bc48ac0e59f354ae11d0f5a79e205ba
Merge pull request #3937 from yebblies/issue2350
Issue 2350 - Contracts with a naked body are indecent
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2350
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2350
--- Comment #2 from Don 2011-09-05 00:23:54 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> In which case, what would "naked" do? If nothing, the compiler ought to
> disallow it.
For non-naked functions, the contracts don't set up a stack frame, because t
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2350
Stewart Gordon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@iname.com
--- Comment #1 from St
