https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2511
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|1.043 |D1
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2511
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2511
Brad Roberts changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bra...@puremagic.com
--- Comment #9 fro
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2511
--- Comment #8 from Walter Bright 2010-08-29
12:55:08 PDT ---
This now fails:
class UA {
A29 f() { return null; }
}
class UB : UA {
B29 f() { return null; }
}
class A29
{
}
class B29 : A29
{
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.pur
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2511
--- Comment #7 from Rainer Schuetze 2010-08-28 00:23:08
PDT ---
Oh, it's only been tested on interfaces. ClassDeclaration::isBaseInfoComplete()
is broken, class Object doesn't need a base class:
int ClassDeclaration::isBaseInfoComplete()
{
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2511
--- Comment #6 from Walter Bright 2010-08-27
22:49:56 PDT ---
Partial apply of patch:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/dmd/changeset/638
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2511
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
--- Comment #
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2511
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Schuetze 2009-09-18 01:07:31
PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=456)
better detection if a base class is forward referenced
The current implementation (as of DMD 2.032) defers covariance analysis only if
the base cla
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2511
s...@iname.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@iname.com
Summary|dmd f
