https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2596
--- Comment #11 from Dlang Bot ---
dlang/dlang.org pull request #3602 "Updates to Template Comparison page" was
merged into master:
- 00028f506c024b3b08c9bd2e6fdcfa000fb0 by tjs137:
Constructor templates are supported since 2.027
See resolve
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2596
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |D2
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2596
bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2596
--- Comment #9 from jarrett.billings...@gmail.com 2009-03-16 20:46 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
>
> Well, ahem... It's a bug (or rather a missing functionality), that's why this
> report is here :)
>
Sure, and I'm just trying to pr
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2596
--- Comment #8 from 2kor...@gmail.com 2009-03-16 19:59 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> >
> > Walter didn't say it is impossible, he merely pointed out that the case is
> > not
> > a variadic constructor, but a /variadic template/ con
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2596
--- Comment #7 from jarrett.billings...@gmail.com 2009-03-16 19:48 ---
>
> Walter didn't say it is impossible, he merely pointed out that the case is not
> a variadic constructor, but a /variadic template/ constructor, I believe.
>
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2596
--- Comment #6 from 2kor...@gmail.com 2009-03-16 19:07 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > It isn't variadic constructors, it's any constructor templates.
> >
>
> Why? Ctors are not virtual; why can't they b
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2596
--- Comment #5 from jarrett.billings...@gmail.com 2009-03-16 18:56 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> It isn't variadic constructors, it's any constructor templates.
>
Why? Ctors are not virtual; why can't they be templated?
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2596
--- Comment #4 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-03-16 18:44 ---
It isn't variadic constructors, it's any constructor templates.
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2596
s...@iname.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@iname.com
--- Comment #3 fr
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2596
--- Comment #2 from and...@metalanguage.com 2009-01-21 09:13 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> S s = S();
>
> What should be called - a default ctor or S.this() with empty tuple?
>
Good question. Today that must be the default ctor be
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2596
--- Comment #1 from 2kor...@gmail.com 2009-01-21 01:19 ---
S s = S();
What should be called - a default ctor or S.this() with empty tuple?
--
12 matches
Mail list logo
