[Issue 2596] Variadic constructors don't compile
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2596 --- Comment #11 from Dlang Bot --- dlang/dlang.org pull request #3602 "Updates to Template Comparison page" was merged into master: - 00028f506c024b3b08c9bd2e6fdcfa000fb0 by tjs137: Constructor templates are supported since 2.027 See resolved Bugzilla issue 2596. https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/pull/3602 --
[Issue 2596] Variadic constructors don't compile
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2596 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |D2 --
[Issue 2596] Variadic constructors don't compile
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2596 bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #10 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-04-01 13:52 --- Fixed DMD 2.027 --
[Issue 2596] Variadic constructors don't compile
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2596 --- Comment #7 from jarrett.billings...@gmail.com 2009-03-16 19:48 --- Walter didn't say it is impossible, he merely pointed out that the case is not a variadic constructor, but a /variadic template/ constructor, I believe. I didn't say that he said that it was impossible ;) I asked why can't ctors be templated as in why is it not possible now instead of why is it not possible. --
[Issue 2596] Variadic constructors don't compile
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2596 --- Comment #2 from and...@metalanguage.com 2009-01-21 09:13 --- (In reply to comment #1) S s = S(); What should be called - a default ctor or S.this() with empty tuple? Good question. Today that must be the default ctor because any struct must have a default constructor that doesn't execute user code. --
[Issue 2596] Variadic constructors don't compile
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2596 --- Comment #1 from 2kor...@gmail.com 2009-01-21 01:19 --- S s = S(); What should be called - a default ctor or S.this() with empty tuple? --