[Issue 2807] Marking a nested function as 'pure' may cause bad code generations silently accepted

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2807 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.027 |D2 --

[Issue 2807] Marking a nested function as 'pure' may cause bad code generations silently accepted

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2807 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 2807] Marking a nested function as 'pure' may cause bad code generations silently accepted

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2807 --- Comment #2 from clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-04-22 15:09 --- Created an attachment (id=335) --> (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=335&action=view) Patch against 2.029. Includes patch for the related bug 2695, as well

[Issue 2807] Marking a nested function as 'pure' may cause bad code generations silently accepted

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2807 --- Comment #1 from clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-04-22 15:07 --- And here's a patch. This makes it safe to have nested pure functions. A nested pure function is only permitted to access its own variables, plus immutables and manifest co