[Issue 2819] array.sort segfaults if array length =0x8F_FFFF

2014-04-18 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2819

Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|1.042   |D1

--


[Issue 2819] array.sort segfaults if array length =0x8F_FFFF

2012-01-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2819



--- Comment #8 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-01-27 21:08:32 PST ---
Commit pushed to phobos-1.x at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/12b9cb5db63216c33485681edc83f2f272d869f9
fix Issue 2819 - array.sort segfaults if array length =0x8F_

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 2819] array.sort segfaults if array length =0x8F_FFFF

2012-01-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2819



--- Comment #9 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-01-27 21:09:54 PST ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/commit/077c1bd9948dce0a645cc5df5b9dc8919a2295fc
Issue 2819 - array.sort segfaults if array length =0x8F_

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 2819] array.sort segfaults if array length =0x8F_FFFF

2012-01-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2819


Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
 Resolution||FIXED


-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 2819] array.sort segfaults if array length =0x8F_FFFF

2011-05-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2819


Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com


--- Comment #6 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2011-05-24 
22:24:36 PDT ---
I can't recreate this bug on 2.053. If others can confirm, close this down I
guess.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 2819] array.sort segfaults if array length =0x8F_FFFF

2009-04-07 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2819





--- Comment #3 from and...@metalanguage.com  2009-04-07 15:05 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
 (In reply to comment #1)
  (In reply to comment #0)
   This is just another reason for the built-in .sort to be deprecated.
  
  I don't understand.  How is this bug a consequence of sort being built in?
 
 It isn't. But the fact that the built-in sort is buggy as well as slow and
 limited, further weakens its appeal. It just doesn't seem to have much going
 for it.
 

I agree. By the way, if anyone has run numbers on the relative speeds of
various sort implementations, please share.


-- 



[Issue 2819] array.sort segfaults if array length =0x8F_FFFF

2009-04-07 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2819





--- Comment #4 from matti.niemenmaa+dbugzi...@iki.fi  2009-04-07 15:17 
---
http://www.dsource.org/projects/tango/ticket/571 has some old numbers.


-- 



[Issue 2819] array.sort segfaults if array length =0x8F_FFFF

2009-04-07 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2819


s...@iname.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||s...@iname.com
   Keywords||wrong-code




--- Comment #1 from s...@iname.com  2009-04-07 14:20 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
 This is just another reason for the built-in .sort to be deprecated.

I don't understand.  How is this bug a consequence of sort being built in?


-- 



[Issue 2819] array.sort segfaults if array length =0x8F_FFFF

2009-04-07 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2819





--- Comment #5 from s...@iname.com  2009-04-07 16:19 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
 I agree. By the way, if anyone has run numbers on the relative speeds of
 various sort implementations, please share.

What's a run number?

Anyway, here's a program I wrote a while ago to benchmark sorting algorithms:

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/announce/Sorting_algorithms_benchmark_7661.html
http://pr.stewartsplace.org.uk/d/sortbench.d


--