[Issue 2955] Compiler rejects chained <>=
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2955 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Version|1.041 |D1 --
[Issue 2955] Compiler rejects chained <>=
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2955 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED CC||and...@metalanguage.com Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #4 from Andrei Alexandrescu 2011-01-08 16:17:12 PST --- I think we're good as we are. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2955] Compiler rejects chained <>=
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2955 jarrett.billings...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | --- Comment #3 from jarrett.billings...@gmail.com 2009-05-09 20:46 --- Fair enough :) --
[Issue 2955] Compiler rejects chained <>=
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2955 --- Comment #2 from lijat...@gmail.com 2009-05-09 20:05 --- In that case I think that a better error message would be needed. The current one left me confused about if it was a compiler bug or by design. --
[Issue 2955] Compiler rejects chained <>=
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2955 jarrett.billings...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Comment #1 from jarrett.billings...@gmail.com 2009-05-09 10:31 --- This is by design. Comparison operators cannot be chained like this. C accepts such foolishness as "a < b < c" even though it doesn't do what you'd expect (i.e. it doesn't evaluate to "a < b && b < c"). D changed all comparison operators to have the same precedence so that this kind of code would not be accepted, and for possible future expansion in which chained comparisons really would be converted into multiple clauses. --
