[Issue 3020] No description is given why function may not be nothrow

2010-10-29 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3020 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3020] No description is given why function may not be nothrow

2010-10-29 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3020 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3020] No description is given why function may not be nothrow

2010-10-29 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3020 --- Comment #7 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-10-29 05:30:34 PDT --- (In reply to comment #5) Out of memory errors should be allowed inside nothrow. Good. I think so too. That will make nothrow much more useful. In the existing compiler,

[Issue 3020] No description is given why function may not be nothrow

2010-10-29 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3020 --- Comment #8 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2010-10-29 10:29:39 PDT --- (In reply to comment #7) In the existing compiler, they are disallowed. That's a bug. ( void foo() nothrow { auto x = new int; } won't compile). I

[Issue 3020] No description is given why function may not be nothrow

2010-10-29 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3020 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3020] No description is given why function may not be nothrow

2010-10-29 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3020 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3020] No description is given why function may not be nothrow

2010-10-22 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3020 --- Comment #3 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-10-22 17:16:07 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=790) patch against svn 724 This is a big patch, but it's very simple. When checking for the return type of functions, the info about whether it

[Issue 3020] No description is given why function may not be nothrow

2010-10-22 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3020 --- Comment #4 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-10-22 17:23:09 PDT --- For the initial test case, the error messages are: test.d(17): Error: writefln is not nothrow test0.d(13): Error: function test0.test 'test' is nothrow yet may throw

[Issue 3020] No description is given why function may not be nothrow

2010-09-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3020 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---

[Issue 3020] No description is given why function may not be nothrow

2010-09-18 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3020 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|