http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3020
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3020
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3020
--- Comment #7 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-10-29 05:30:34 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Out of memory errors should be allowed inside nothrow.
Good. I think so too. That will make nothrow much more useful.
In the existing compiler,
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3020
--- Comment #8 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2010-10-29
10:29:39 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
In the existing compiler, they are disallowed.
That's a bug.
( void foo() nothrow { auto x = new int; } won't compile).
I
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3020
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3020
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3020
--- Comment #3 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-10-22 17:16:07 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=790)
patch against svn 724
This is a big patch, but it's very simple. When checking for the return type of
functions, the info about whether it
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3020
--- Comment #4 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-10-22 17:23:09 PDT ---
For the initial test case, the error messages are:
test.d(17): Error: writefln is not nothrow
test0.d(13): Error: function test0.test 'test' is nothrow yet may throw
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3020
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3020
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
10 matches
Mail list logo