[Issue 3118] Need a clear spec on how inapplicable attributes are handled

2014-04-18 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3118 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|1.045 |D1 --

[Issue 3118] Need a clear spec on how inapplicable attributes are handled

2011-02-22 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3118 --- Comment #4 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2011-02-22 16:11:49 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) attribute int a; attribute: int a; attribute { int a; } should all have the same meaning for a. This whole debate is about legality,

[Issue 3118] Need a clear spec on how inapplicable attributes are handled

2010-11-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3118 --- Comment #2 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2010-11-10 04:35:28 PST --- (In reply to comment #1) i, ii, and iii are equivalent as documented. I think that should remain, as it would be very confusing to make them behave differently.

[Issue 3118] Need a clear spec on how inapplicable attributes are handled

2010-11-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3118 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED