[Issue 3478] "no effect in expression" error on return to void

2014-04-18 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3478 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Version|1.051 |D1 --

[Issue 3478] "no effect in expression" error on return to void

2009-12-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3478 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 3478] "no effect in expression" error on return to void

2009-11-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3478 --- Comment #5 from Walter Bright 2009-11-30 02:31:19 PST --- I'll change the spec to say that it's illegal to have a void return expression with no side effects. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Issue 3478] "no effect in expression" error on return to void

2009-11-05 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3478 Don changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au --- Comment #4 from Don 2

[Issue 3478] "no effect in expression" error on return to void

2009-11-05 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3478 --- Comment #2 from Moritz Warning 2009-11-05 19:21:30 PST --- You should change the spec in this case: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/statement.html "Expression is allowed even if the function specifies a void return type. The Expression

[Issue 3478] "no effect in expression" error on return to void

2009-11-05 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3478 --- Comment #3 from Moritz Warning 2009-11-05 19:23:17 PST --- fwiw, the new behavior makes sense to me. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 3478] "no effect in expression" error on return to void

2009-11-05 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3478 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #