[Issue 3794] Phobos' socket.receive should assert on the length of the target array
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3794 Peter Alexander changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #4 from Peter Alexander 2014-02-22 05:15:51 PST --- As per above discussion, closing this as WONTFIX because: 1. There is no evidence this is a common bug. 2. The code already handles 0-length arrays. 3. There may be user code relying in the current behaviour. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3794] Phobos' socket.receive should assert on the length of the target array
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3794 Stanislav Blinov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stanislav.bli...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Stanislav Blinov 2014-02-15 15:12:30 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) > I propose we close this as WONTFIX. As Vladimir says, the function handles it > safely, and there may be code out there relying on this. > > If there are no objections within a week, I'll close it. I agree. The function signature already indicates that no resizing is performed (it's void[], not ref void[]), so the assumption itself is unsubstantiated. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3794] Phobos' socket.receive should assert on the length of the target array
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3794 Peter Alexander changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter.alexander...@gmail.co ||m --- Comment #2 from Peter Alexander 2014-02-15 13:09:50 PST --- I propose we close this as WONTFIX. As Vladimir says, the function handles it safely, and there may be code out there relying on this. If there are no objections within a week, I'll close it. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3794] Phobos' socket.receive should assert on the length of the target array
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3794 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thecybersha...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Panteleev 2011-08-23 19:09:04 PDT --- It's probably too late to change this now. WONTFIX? Also, it would probably have to be an enforce, not an assert. By the way, the function already special-cased 0-length arrays, by always returning 0 instead of passing it to the C socket function. > A common mistake Citation needed ;) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
