http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3796
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
--- Comme
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3796
Martin Nowak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3796
--- Comment #4 from Walter Bright 2010-02-13
14:47:25 PST ---
Yes, I think it's pretty clear going the demangler route is better. I agree
there should be some other means to get the parameter identifiers.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.pur
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3796
Rainer Schuetze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r.sagita...@gmx.de
--- Comment #3 fr
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3796
--- Comment #2 from Walter Bright 2010-02-13
00:36:21 PST ---
The problem could be fixed by having .stringof demangle the deco, rather than
pretty-printing the type it came from. Unfortunately, there isn't a demangler
in the compiler at the mo
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3796
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
--- Comment #
