[Issue 3836] [tdpl] obligatory override attribute

2012-09-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3836 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 3836] [tdpl] obligatory override attribute

2012-09-25 Thread d-bugmail
/d6d3ed2527981df536e2e6b3f7d313bbf2f52cd1 Fix Issue 3836 - [TDPL] obligatory override attribute Move requiring the override attribute to the next stage, from warning to deprecated. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/262583955e55f03f970af130590225b898164ae0 Merge pull request #462 from yebblies/issue3836 Issue 3836

[Issue 3836] [tdpl] obligatory override attribute

2012-02-28 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3836 Stewart Gordon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s...@iname.com --- Comment #11 from S

[Issue 3836] [TDPL] obligatory override attribute

2011-10-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3836 --- Comment #10 from yebblies 2011-10-19 22:06:55 EST --- Patch to make it deprecated: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/462 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are recei

[Issue 3836] [TDPL] obligatory override attribute

2011-10-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3836 --- Comment #9 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-10-09 13:31:58 PDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > The reason this is marked as a warning is to not break existing code without > providing a long transition period for users. The next step will be

[Issue 3836] [TDPL] obligatory override attribute

2011-10-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3836 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #

[Issue 3836] [TDPL] obligatory override attribute

2011-06-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3836 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Issue 3836] [TDPL] obligatory override attribute

2011-04-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3836 --- Comment #6 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-04-26 10:27:29 PDT --- I was about to write an answer like yours, sorry :-) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail becau

[Issue 3836] [TDPL] obligatory override attribute

2011-04-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3836 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan M Davis 2011-04-26 10:25:50 PDT --- class Foo(T, R...) : Foo!R { override void bar() { super.bar(); } } class Foo(T){ void bar() {} } void main() { new Foo!(int, float)(); } I don't see wha

[Issue 3836] [TDPL] obligatory override attribute

2011-04-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3836 --- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-04-26 10:10:36 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > You add override to the subclass' bar function's signature. Do you want to show me the code that compiles with -w? -- Configure issuemail: http:

[Issue 3836] [TDPL] obligatory override attribute

2011-04-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3836 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan M Davis 2011-04-26 09:31:26 PDT --- You add override to the subclass' bar function's signature. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail be

[Issue 3836] [TDPL] obligatory override attribute

2011-04-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3836 --- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-04-26 04:26:24 PDT --- How do you compile this with "-w" (warnings on) (reduced from code by Benjamin Thaut)? class Foo(T, R...) : Foo!R { void bar() { super.bar(); } } class Foo(

[Issue 3836] [TDPL] obligatory override attribute

2011-03-22 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3836 Jonathan M Davis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com Summa