http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3967
--- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-03-18 14:30:25 PDT --- This shows why requiring a bool as return value of opEquals is necessary for generic code too (adapted from an idea of Bill Baxter): import std.c.stdio: printf; struct Foo { int x; int opEquals(T:Foo)(T other) { printf("****\n"); return this.x - other.x; } } bool bar(T)(T f1, T f2) { // return f1 == f2; // ERR return !!(f1 == f2); // OK, but silly } void main() { bool r = bar(Foo(1), Foo(2)); } -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------