[Issue 4133] Enable __traits on D1

2015-06-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4133

Andrei Alexandrescu  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|future  |D2

--


[Issue 4133] Enable __traits on D1

2011-01-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4133


nfx...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID


-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 4133] Enable __traits on D1

2010-05-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4133



--- Comment #5 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-05-26 15:37:29 PDT ---
I was just saying you have to use "char[][] b = [...]" instead of "auto b =
[...]". This is the only point where you have to modify the examples in the
traits documentation to make it work on D1+this patch. That change doesn't have
to do anything with __traits or this patch. It's just that "auto b = ["a",
"bc"];" simply doesn't compile in D1.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 4133] Enable __traits on D1

2010-05-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4133


Trass3r  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mrmoc...@gmx.de


--- Comment #4 from Trass3r  2010-05-26 15:13:13 PDT ---
> you have to use "char[][] b = [__traits(allMembers, D) ];"

allMembers returns a tuple now which is a lot better for compile-time
iterations.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 4133] Enable __traits on D1

2010-05-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4133



--- Comment #3 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-05-06 01:09:09 PDT ---
That's true, but it can change in D1 as well. If enhancement #3702 gets
accepted, the magic namespace can be prefixed with "std." or "__" in D1 to
maintain backwards compatibility. But I don't really think __traits will go
away so fast.

Anyway, this feature would be really helpful. Many D1 users are tired of
parsing .stringof results to get their stuff done, but they can't suddenly
switch to D2 either.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 4133] Enable __traits on D1

2010-05-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4133


Don  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au


--- Comment #2 from Don  2010-05-06 00:51:10 PDT ---
This is quite premature, since __traits is still experimental in D2, and its
syntax will hopefully change. It is deliberately not mentioned in Andrei's
book.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 4133] Enable __traits on D1

2010-05-01 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4133



--- Comment #1 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-05-01 11:14:41 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=616)
enable __traits in D1

I figured it was unfair to leave all the work to Walter, so I wrote a patch.

It was simple: mostly I had to remove a bunch of "#if DMDV2", and copy some
missing bits from the D2 source tree (which is slightly different from the D1
tree, whatever). The D1 traits.c file was outdated (I don't know why), so I
just appended D2's traits.c to it (to keep the diff non-confusing). Note that I
still made s small change to the copied part, oh well.

I tried all examples from http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/traits.html, and all
seemed to work correctly. Note that you can't write "auto b = [
__traits(allMembers, D) ];" in D1, instead you have to use "char[][] b = [
__traits(allMembers, D) ];" (array type inference was changed in D2).

This patch is against the dmd 1.059 Beta, which (probably) corresponds dmd svn
revision 461.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---