[Issue 4319] Constructor templates in struct/class templates documented as __ctor(T)

[d-bugmail]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4319


Kenji Hara  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


--- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara  2012-05-30 17:56:28 PDT ---
In 2.060head, template constructor is documented correctly.

code:

/// Example
struct Bug4319b {
/// Template constructor
this(U)(U u) { }
}


output:

struct Bug4319b;
Example

this(U)(U u);
Template constructor


-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 4319] Constructor templates in struct/class templates documented as __ctor(T)

[d-bugmail]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4319


kenn...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||kenn...@gmail.com


--- Comment #2 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-06-05 00:43:09 PDT ---
It's not really due to bug 4107. Even in the following case the constructor is
documented as 'auto __ctor' instead of 'this'.


---
/// Example
struct Bug4319b {
/// Template constructor
this(U)(U u) { }
}
---

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 4319] Constructor templates in struct/class templates documented as __ctor(T)

[d-bugmail]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4319


Jonathan M Davis  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com


--- Comment #1 from Jonathan M Davis  2011-01-12 00:06:59 
PST ---
It's also worth noting that the template's constraints also end up in the html,
which is not normal (though one could argue that having it in there would be
useful).

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---