[Issue 4425] More bells & whistles for bitfields

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4425 Mathias LANG changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 4425] More bells whistles for bitfields

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4425 --- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-08-03 03:06:07 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Adding const to a field seems pretty easy; specifically the setter is simply left out of the template. OK. So as a final proposed usage, it

[Issue 4425] More bells whistles for bitfields

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4425 Era Scarecrow rtcv...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Issue 4425] More bells whistles for bitfields

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4425 --- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-10-04 18:16:44 PDT --- Another possible feature is to make std.bitmanip.bitfields generate two versions of the code, that get compiled conditionally according to the CPU endianess: static if

[Issue 4425] More bells whistles for bitfields

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4425 --- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-09-24 18:47:19 PDT --- See also bug 4937 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---