[Issue 4440] [patch] Inlining delegate literals

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4440 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 --

[Issue 4440] [patch] Inlining delegate literals

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4440 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Hardware|Other |All --

[Issue 4440] [patch] Inlining delegate literals

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4440 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||performance --

[Issue 4440] [patch] Inlining delegate literals

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4440 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://issues.dlang.org/sh

[Issue 4440] [patch] Inlining delegate literals

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4440 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #11 from

[Issue 4440] [patch] Inlining delegate literals

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4440 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added Version|D1 & D2 |D2 --

[Issue 4440] [patch] Inlining delegate literals

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4440 --- Comment #10 from Brad Roberts 2010-08-29 14:31:55 PDT --- Agreed. Getting delegate inlining in dmd is going to take serious work. The problem is that the inliner is no where near a const propagation pass. It needs to know that the varia

[Issue 4440] [patch] Inlining delegate literals

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4440 --- Comment #9 from David Simcha 2010-08-29 14:26:50 PDT --- I just tried this patch out and on second thought I'm not sure it's worth integrating as-is because it's so limited. It won't even handle the case where a function that calls a deleg

[Issue 4440] [patch] Inlining delegate literals

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4440 David Simcha changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||4264 Summary|[patch] inlined