[Issue 4581] extern function pointers inside functions
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4581 Basile-z changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||b2.t...@gmx.com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Basile-z --- fixed by https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/15582. The problem was actually not the extern attribute but the mangle. --
[Issue 4581] extern function pointers inside functions
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4581 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 --
[Issue 4581] extern function pointers inside functions
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4581 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2013-01-22 10:36:04 PST --- Walter can we get your opinion on this? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4581] extern function pointers inside functions
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4581 --- Comment #4 from Simen Kjaeraas simen.kja...@gmail.com 2010-10-26 15:22:51 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) You can't express intention with extern attribute, because it's ambiguous: whether it specifies an external function or internal function with specific calling convention. Currently there's no way to differentiate between these two cases. But is there really a difference? Currently, extern( foo ) means 'use foo's calling conventions and name mangling'. As long as the latter is also part of the definition, I do not see such a difference. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4581] extern function pointers inside functions
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4581 nfx...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nfx...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-08-04 09:05:38 PDT --- It's a feature, not a bug. If the declaration is contained in something nested (like a struct, I guess it also applies to functions), name extern doesn't disable mangling. You can ask Walter for the why. However I didn't find this in the spec and I could be wrong, so I'll leave it to others to find this and mark the bug as invalid. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4581] extern function pointers inside functions
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4581 --- Comment #2 from Simen Kjaeraas simen.kja...@gmail.com 2010-08-04 09:20:14 PDT --- I cannot foresee any instance in which it is wanted that the compiler disregard the extern declaration, and even if this is the case, there should at least be a warning as it blithely ignores the programmer's intention. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4581] extern function pointers inside functions
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4581 --- Comment #3 from Sobirari Muhomori dfj1es...@sneakemail.com 2010-08-04 10:07:30 PDT --- You can't express intention with extern attribute, because it's ambiguous: whether it specifies an external function or internal function with specific calling convention. Currently there's no way to differentiate between these two cases. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
