[Issue 4881] _d_arrayliteralT() called in instances where a blit should suffice

2013-10-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4881


Denis Shelomovskij  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||verylonglogin@gmail.com


--- Comment #6 from Denis Shelomovskij  2013-10-25 
00:24:40 MSD ---
This is now a duplicate of Issue 11345 because of fixing Issue 11238.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 11345 ***

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 4881] _d_arrayliteralT() called in instances where a blit should suffice

2012-02-01 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4881


yebblies  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
 Resolution||DUPLICATE


--- Comment #5 from yebblies  2012-02-02 15:34:11 EST ---
*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 2356 ***

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 4881] _d_arrayliteralT() called in instances where a blit should suffice

2010-09-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4881



--- Comment #4 from Steven Schveighoffer  2010-09-17 
15:33:49 PDT ---
const cX = X([1,2]);

that [1,2] sure looks like a literal to me...

Legitimately, you could say the compiler should be able to call
_d_arrayliteralT once to initialize cX, but not call it every time cX is used.

But I think it's different than this bug.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 4881] _d_arrayliteralT() called in instances where a blit should suffice

2010-09-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4881



--- Comment #3 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-09-17 15:24:43 PDT ---
There are no array literals in bug 4397 either. But maybe the same underlying
cause because there seems to be something REALLY wrong how the compiler handles
initializing structs with arrays in it, or array initialization.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 4881] _d_arrayliteralT() called in instances where a blit should suffice

2010-09-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4881


Steven Schveighoffer  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||schvei...@yahoo.com


--- Comment #2 from Steven Schveighoffer  2010-09-17 
15:01:48 PDT ---
It might be related but it's not a dup, because in those bugs, you actually are
using array literals.  I don't see any array literal's in Sean's example.  In
fact, there's no dynamic arrays anywhere.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 4881] _d_arrayliteralT() called in instances where a blit should suffice

2010-09-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4881


nfx...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||nfx...@gmail.com


--- Comment #1 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-09-17 14:31:35 PDT ---
Probably a duplicate of bug 2356 or bug 4397.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---