[Issue 5142] writefln should allow no arguments (no formating string)

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5142 --- Comment #5 from Witold Baryluk bary...@smp.if.uj.edu.pl 2010-11-03 04:16:05 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #2) This was a deliberate change. The benefit of writeln is that you can put formatting characters

[Issue 5142] writefln should allow no arguments (no formating string)

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5142 Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 5142] writefln should allow no arguments (no formating string)

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5142 --- Comment #2 from Witold Baryluk bary...@smp.if.uj.edu.pl 2010-11-02 10:33:21 PDT --- This was a deliberate change. The benefit of writeln is that you can put formatting characters in strings without having them interpreted as

[Issue 5142] writefln should allow no arguments (no formating string)

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5142 --- Comment #3 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2010-11-02 11:08:04 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) This was a deliberate change. The benefit of writeln is that you can put formatting characters in strings without having

[Issue 5142] writefln should allow no arguments (no formating string)

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5142 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---