https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5219
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5219
--- Comment #15 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---
See the start of the development of @nogc here:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3455
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5219
Denis Shelomovskij changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||verylonglogin@gmail.com
--- C
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5219
--- Comment #13 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-02-20 09:42:39 PST ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> More than just annotating "no GC" or "no Heap", what would be nice is being
> able to mark any sections with the same qualifiers as functions.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5219
--- Comment #12 from Rob T 2013-02-20 09:06:59 PST ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> More than just annotating "no GC" or "no Heap", what would be nice is being
> able to mark any sections with the same qualifiers as functions.
>
> For example,
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5219
monarchdo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com
--- Com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5219
Dicebot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.stras...@gmail.com
--- Comment #10 from Di
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5219
--- Comment #9 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-02-19 18:42:48 PST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> We definitely need to mark localized sections of code to be off limits from
> the
> GC.
The point of annotations like @nogc or @noheap is to den
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5219
Rob T changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||al...@ucora.com
--- Comment #8 from Rob T 201
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5219
--- Comment #7 from Sobirari Muhomori 2010-11-20
14:24:31 PST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> This is not only performance but also behavior.
Multithreading, GC and TLS have global consequences, who knows, how third-party
code will react on it
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5219
Michal Minich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michal.min...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5219
SHOO changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zan77...@nifty.com
--- Comment #5 from SHOO 20
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5219
--- Comment #4 from Sobirari Muhomori 2010-11-18
12:40:40 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> No.
> Use a profiler.
I compiled this code with profiler
---
class A
{
int delegate() a;
}
A f()
{
int a=1;
int g()
{
a+=3;
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5219
nfx...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nfx...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5219
--- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-17 15:55:19 PST ---
This problem may be solved by a better profiler, or by an alternative to the
switch suggested in bug 5070
If this idea is bad then it may be closed.
--
Configure issuemail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5219
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
--- Comment #1 from Don 2
16 matches
Mail list logo
