[Issue 5323] std.math: struct FloatingPointControl, duplicate code and assumes X86

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5323 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 --

[Issue 5323] std.math: struct FloatingPointControl, duplicate code and assumes X86

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5323 --- Comment #6 from Iain Buclaw --- Has been improved somewhat by: https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/4272 https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/5769 --

[Issue 5323] std.math: struct FloatingPointControl, duplicate code and assumes X86

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5323 Guillaume Chatelet changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 5323] std.math: struct FloatingPointControl, duplicate code and assumes X86

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5323 --- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw --- (In reply to Infiltrator from comment #2) > Is this still an issue? I'd have a look at the source, but I'm afraid that > I wouldn't be able to tell what's X86 or SPARC, etc. Well, X86 code

[Issue 5323] std.math: struct FloatingPointControl, duplicate code and assumes X86

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5323 --- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw --- Both struct FloatingPointControl and Ieeeflags still have their own private enums. Since these values should be mirrored somewhere in druntime stdc (it looks like the me of five years ago

[Issue 5323] std.math: struct FloatingPointControl, duplicate code and assumes X86

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5323 Infiltrator changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 5323] std.math: struct FloatingPointControl, duplicate code and assumes X86

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5323 --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com 2010-12-05 08:30:25 PST --- Hmm... also found in fenv.h, so perhaps should just be importing core.stdc.fenv (merging any bits added by std.math). -- Configure issuemail: